JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I holds a quantitatively derived Neutral Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating suggests the model does not express a clear expectation of outperformance or underperformance relative to peers over a full market cycle.
People: Average
The People Pillar assessment is based on quantitative measures of manager experience, track record, and alignment. Over periods of up to 10 years, the successful manager experience metric, calculated across the actively managed strategies the manager has run over that period, ranks slightly below peers. Separately, we measure risk-adjusted excess return by analyzing managers' information ratios over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. These rank below peers, slightly below peers, and slightly below peers, respectively. Reported manager investment in the fund is between USD 100,000 and USD 500,000.
Process: Average
The Process rating is driven by the fund's gross-of-fee information ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted excess return. Over one, three, and five years, it ranks below peers, slightly below peers, and above peers, respectively. The parent firm's risk-adjusted success ratio, which measures the share of its equity funds that outperform peers, ranks slightly above peer firms over 10 years.
Performance (in US Dollar)
Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I share class returned 18%, underperforming both its category index, the Morningstar US Mid TR USD Index (25.7%), and its Morningstar category peers (26.7%). Across the 10-year period, the fund returned 11.2% per year, below the index (12.2% per year) and Morningstar Category average (11.8% per year).
Price
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.84% per year. It places it in the middle quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Mid-Cap Blend Category, where the median fee is 0.83% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of -0.08, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.