Bond Funds Start 2022 in a Sea of Red
As the Fed looks to raise interest rates, funds most sensitive to rate changes have been hit hardest.
As the Fed looks to raise interest rates, funds most sensitive to rate changes have been hit hardest.
Lately, there’s been virtually no place for bond investors to hide.
Every major category of bond funds--with exception of funds that invest in bank loans--has started 2022 with losses, and in most cases, extending declines posted last year.
With inflation rising and the Federal Reserve signaling that a series of interest-rate increases are on the way, funds holding bonds that are the most sensitive to changes in interest rates have been the hardest hit. Morningstar analyst Sam Kulahan points out that longer-duration funds are doing worse, while shorter-duration funds are doing better on a relative basis given their lower rate sensitivity and the rise in rates.
For example, long government funds--which tend to move the most when yields rise or fall--have taken the great hit among major bond fund categories, losing 5.1% since the start of the year.
But the damage has been much more broad-based than that. Funds that normally provide some level of cushion against rising rates--such as short-term bond funds--and those with equity-market-like attributes, such as corporate bonds and high-yield bond funds--are also in the red. In fact, the 10 largest bond funds are all in the red so far in 2022. Vanguard’s Total Bond Market strategies, the largest bond fund in the world, is down 2.42%. And even the best-performing funds in most categories are still posting negative returns. Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) is one of the top-performing intermediate-bond funds this year but is still down 1.44%.
Bank-loan funds, which invest in bonds with floating-rate coupons that often benefit from a rising rate environment, have held up the best, says Kulahan. Emerging-markets local-currency bond funds have also generally produced positive returns so far, as some emerging-markets central banks raised rates last year and the dollar has been weaker this year, he says.
But inflation-protected bond funds, the top-performing group of 2021 and the area that saw the most inflows, are down 2.36%, though the sell-off has proved that not all inflation-protected bond funds are created equal. Vanguard Short-term Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (VTIPX) is faring the best, only down 0.74%, while Pimco Real Return (PRRIX) is down 3.24%.
Broadly, the worst damage has been among funds the most sensitive to interest-rate increases, as measured by the average effective duration of their portfolio.
The largest intermediate-term bond funds have declined in similar fashion. The largest bond fund, Vanguard Total Bond Market (VTBIX), is down 2.42%. American Funds Bond Fund of America (CFACX) has lost 2.41%, and Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTNX) is down 2.31%.
Dodge & Cox Income (DODIX) is managing slightly better with a loss of only 1.99%. Kulahan says the strategy's long-standing shorter-than-benchmark duration makes it less sensitive than its competitors to changes in interest rates. This structural stance helps it hold up better than its benchmark and most peers when rates spike, but also leads to relative underperformance when rates are falling, he says.
Funds that ventured outside the typical realm of intermediate-term bonds are holding up the best. Hartford Schroder’s Tax-Aware (HTAB) holds an outsize stake in municipal bonds compared with the average intermediate-core bond fund and Putnam Mortgage Securities (PGSBX) takes risks in mortgage credit. Both funds rank in the top 10% of their categories this year to date.
Bronze-rated Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund is down 1.44% compared with the average 2.23% decline in the category. Supreet Grewal wrote in August that the fund has behaved reliably through credit and interest-rate events. For example, it held up well during interest-rate sell-offs, owing to its persistent shorter duration, including in late 2016 and early 2018, she says.
Among high-yield funds, RiverPark Short Term High Yield Retail (RPHYX) is posting positive returns for the year, while the category is down 1.57%. Kulahan says since approximately 40%-50% of the portfolio rolls into cash every 30 days, which the team must quickly invest in available issues, results in a lower average effective maturity (typically three to five months) than both the high-yield category and a subset of high-yield strategies with a short-term mandate. As of that shorter-maturity focus its duration is one of the lowest in the category, which helps insulate it when rates rise. Its duration is 0.4 years as of December 2021 versus the high-yield category norm of 3.5 years, he adds.
Katherine Lynch does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.