This fund has a Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 5 globes, indicating that the ESG risk of holdings in its portfolio is rather low relative to those of its peers in the Morningstar Energy Sector Equity category. ESG risk measures the degree to which material environmental, social, and governance issues, such as such as climate change, biodiversity, human capital, as well as bribery and corruption, could affect valuations. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about driving positive environmental and social outcomes for society’s benefit.
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF holds itself out to be a sustainable or ESG-focused investment. In other words, ESG concerns are central to the investment process of this strategy. A fund with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes. SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF has an asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 7.2, indicating that its companies have low exposure to carbon-related risks. These are risks associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy such as increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and stranded assets. The fund's current involvement in fossil fuels rests at 14.3%, which compares favorably with 87.1% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. Smartetfs Sustainable Energy Ii Etf shows 69.1% involvement in carbon solutions. This percentage is high in absolute terms and surpasses the 6.8% average involvement of its peers in the Equity Energy category. Carbon solutions include products and services related to renewable energy, energy efficiency, green buildings, green transportation, and so on.
No companies held by SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF are recognized as being involved in controversies at a high or severe level. From bribery and corruption to workplace discrimination and environmental incidents, controversies are incidents that have a negative impact on stakeholders or the environment, which create some degree of financial risk for the company. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. In addition, they can damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.
By prospectus, the fund aims to avoid, or limit its exposure to, companies associated with thermal coal. However, the fund struggles to fulfill this goal, as it exhibits 1.72% exposure to such companies. This compares with 2.07% for its average peer in the Energy Sector Equity category.