Skip to Content
Morningstar

iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF EMB Sustainability

Morningstar Medalist Rating
| Medalist Rating as of | See iShares Investment Hub

Sustainability Analysis

Author Image

Sustainability Summary

 | Published as of .  Based on data as of

iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF may not appeal to sustainability-conscious investors.

iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF has an average Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 3 globes, indicating that the ESG risk of holdings in its portfolio is similar to that of its peers in the Emerging Markets Fixed Income category. Funds with 4 or 5 globes tend to hold securities that are less exposed to ESG risk. ESG risk provides investors with a signal that reflects to what degree their investments are exposed to risks related to material ESG issues, including climate change, biodiversity, product safety, community relations, data privacy and security, bribery and corruption, and corporate governance, that are not sufficiently managed. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about seeking positive environmental and social outcomes.

One potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF doesn’t have an ESG-focused mandate. Funds with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes. One area to watch is the fund's high carbon risk exposure, as indicated by its Carbon Risk Score of 37.8, suggesting that the portfolio is positioned to fare poorly in the transition to a low-carbon economy. This score represents the asset-weighted carbon risk score of the portfolio holdings, averaged over the trailing 12 months. Companies with high risk classification will likely be disadvantaged in the transition to net zero, while those that are less exposed to climate risks and enable the transition by offering carbon solutions may fare better. Currently, the fund has 63.8% involvement in fossil fuels, which is high in both absolute and relative terms. The fossil fuel involvement of funds in the same Emerging Markets Bond category averages 39.8%. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive at least 5% of their revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. The fund has extremely high exposure (34.19%) to companies with high or severe controversies. From bribery and corruption to workplace discrimination and environmental incidents, controversies are incidents that have a negative impact on stakeholders or the environment, which create some degree of financial risk for the company. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. In addition, they can damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.

ESG Commitment Level Asset Manager

 | Basic  

BlackRock’s efforts to build out topnotch resources and integrate ESG considerations in most parts of its business is impressive, but its sheer size and asset mix hamper its ability to fully embrace a culture of sustainable investing. The firm earns a Morningstar ESG Commitment Level of Basic. In January 2020, CEO Larry Fink made a high-profile declaration that sustainability would become BlackRock’s standard for investing, and this kick-started the firm’s ESG efforts. Since then, the firm has ramped up its integration of ESG criteria to include nearly all actively managed strategies (roughly one third of the firm’s assets) and rolled out fund-level ESG disclosures for all funds. BlackRock has also rolled out dozens of ESG-focused product offerings in recent years. However, both in terms of assets and volume, strategies that cater to sustainability-focused investors continue to be dwarfed by those that don’t (accounting for 4% versus 60% of assets, respectively). Despite being the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock’s ability to push for improvement on ESG issues at investee companies seems limited. Fear of accusations of anticompetitive behavior means the firm is reluctant to file or co-file shareholder resolutions or join onto collaborative engagements. More recently, BlackRock has found itself at the center of anti-ESG sentiment in the United States, making the manager hesitant to promote a strong sustainability agenda, as evidenced by its latest voting record. BlackRock backed only half of key ESG resolutions in 2022, down from 72% in 2021, although still up from 16% in 2020. On climate-specific proposals, BlackRock’s support also waned in 2022, judging them too prescriptive. But changes are afoot to give shareholders a bigger voice in the conversation. In 2021, BlackRock rolled out a pass-through proxy-voting program it calls “Voting Choice,” which allows clients to choose a proxy-voting policy that reflects their individual priorities, effectively empowering investors to vote their own proxies. This option is not yet available to all shareholders, but it is a suitable workaround for those clients who can leverage it. BlackRock’s size gives it an edge over peers, particularly in its ability to process massive volumes of ESG data and translate it into meaningful investment insights. Still, the firm restructured its central sustainable-investing team in October 2022. Some functions, including sustainability research and ESG monitoring, moved into the broader BlackRock Investment Institute, and other functions such as client engagement remain in the renamed Sustainable Transition Solutions unit. The reorganization makes sense in principle, but it will take time for the team to harness new synergies and settle into new roles. The group hasn’t been immune to turnover either. Roughly 30 sustainability-focused professionals (of a team of 70) left the firm since the beginning of 2019, although their roles were quickly backfilled. When it comes to driving outcomes for sustainability-focused investors, BlackRock’s size is in many ways its biggest strength and its biggest weakness, but bright spots remain.