The ESG risk of JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF's holdings is comparable to its peers in the Emerging Markets Fixed Income category, thus earning an average Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 3 globes. Funds in the same category rated 4 or 5 globes tend to hold securities less exposed to ESG risk. Unlike impact, which measures positive environmental and societal outcomes attributable to an investment, ESG risk reflects the degree to which investments could be affected by material ESG issues, including climate change, biodiversity, product safety, community relations, data privacy and security, bribery and corruption, and corporate governance.
One potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF doesn’t have an ESG-focused mandate. A fund with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes. One area to watch is the fund's high carbon risk exposure, as indicated by its Carbon Risk Score of 43.1, suggesting that the portfolio is positioned to fare poorly in the transition to a low-carbon economy. This score represents the asset-weighted carbon risk score of the portfolio holdings, averaged over the trailing 12 months. Companies with high risk classification will likely be disadvantaged in the transition to net zero, while those that are less exposed to climate risks and enable the transition by offering carbon solutions may fare better. Currently, the fund has 66.3% involvement in fossil fuels, which is high in both absolute and relative terms. The fossil fuel involvement of funds in the same Emerging Markets Bond category averages 39.8%. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive at least 5% of their revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. The fund exhibits extremely high exposure (40.93%) to companies with high or severe controversies. Companies with controversies are involved in incidents such as corruption, employee abuses, environmental incidents, and corporate scandals that pose serious business risks to the company. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. Such controversies can also damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.