Skip to Content
Stock Strategist

Although Its Upward Sales Trajectory Persists, Procter & Gamble's Shares Fail to Offer a Bargain

We are maintaining our $106 FVE.


 Procter & Gamble (PG)'s run (now at seven consecutive quarters) of mid- to high-single-digit organic top-line gains continued unfettered in its second fiscal quarter. We surmise this performance was more salient when considering the solid comparisons it lapped (4% growth in the prior-year period) and the extent to which this growth has proven broad-based (with four of its five segments boasting underlying sales increases in the 4%-8% range) and balanced (straddling increased volumes and higher prices, up 3% and 2%, respectively). As opposed to evidencing industry tailwinds, we attribute this to intentional actions taken by the firm over a multi-year horizon (including rationalizing its portfolio mix, driving efficiency savings, and funneling additional resources behind its core brand offerings) to reignite its top line and support its brand intangible asset (which when combined with its cost edge underlays its wide moat). However, we’ve been impressed these gains haven’t encumbered profits. As evidence, adjusted gross margins popped 200 basis points in the quarter to 49.6% (reflecting a 120-basis-point benefit from productivity initiatives), while adjusted operating margins ticked up 190 basis points to 22.8% despite a 150-basis-point increase in marketing.

While management edged up its full-year organic sales (to 4%-5% from 3%-5%) and adjusted EPS guidance (to 8%-11% from 5%-10%), we don’t anticipate altering our near-term forecast that continues to align with P&G’s updated marks (at 4.3% and 8.5%, respectively). Further, we’re holding the line on our $106 fair value estimate and long-term expectations (3%-4% annual sales growth and more than 24% operating margins by fiscal 2029, up from an average of 21.6% over the past three years). But trading at nearly a 20% premium to our intrinsic value, we don’t think the shares reflect looming competitive and macro headwinds and tougher second-half comparisons; we believe investors should await a more favorable entry point.

Erin Lash does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.