Utilities: Valuations Still Running Out of Control
Even the outlook for tightening monetary policies worldwide can't stop utilities from reaching near-record valuations.
Even the outlook for tightening monetary policies worldwide can't stop utilities from reaching near-record valuations.
Utilities' valuations don't seem to be stopping investors. In mid-September U.S. utilities' valuations reached a 14-month high when the median P/FV ratio hit 1.17 for the 40 U.S. utilities in Morningstar's coverage. This is the highest median price/fair value ratio for U.S. utilities since the all-time peak of 1.21 in July 2016.
Other valuation metrics such as price/earnings (22) and price/book (2.1) for U.S. utilities also hit 2017 highs in September and are approaching peak levels from mid-2016. Morningstar's U.S. Utilities Sector Total Return Index hit an all-time high, up 15% year to date through mid-September, including dividends. This was outpacing the S&P 500 (up 13%) and all sectors except healthcare and technology.
Even though utilities' valuations appear exceedingly rich on an absolute basis, the sector's yield paradox--as we call it--continues to give bullish signs. Impressive dividend growth has kept the sector's average yield near 3.5% even with the runup in utilities' stock prices. This is a historically attractive yield premium to market interest rates. During the past 30 years, utilities' average dividend yields have been in line with 10-year U.S. Treasury yields, now near 2.2%. If this historical relationship holds, utilities could have another leg of upside. Alternatively, the sector shouldn't suffer much on an absolute basis if interest rates rise.
On a fundamental level, the sector remains very healthy. Low interest rates have helped boost earnings and cash flow growth. Relatively steady regulation has supported growth projects with attractive returns. Even the lowest allowed returns regulators have awarded recently, near 8%, are a premium to what we think is a fair long-term cost of equity and imply an equity risk premium well above what we think is fair. This financing advantage also is driving earnings growth.
There are two primary sources of moderate uncertainty in the sector. The first is executing on exceptionally large projects, notably the new nuclear units that Southern Company (SO) and Scana are building. Scana management recently proposed abandoning its project in South Carolina, opening itself to political and regulatory scrutiny that could end up costing shareholders through unrecovered investment. This uncertainty has depressed Scana's valuation and performance to the point where we now think it presents a good risk-reward trade-off. Southern Company is moving forward with its project but still suffers the depressed valuation because of cost overruns.
The second source of uncertainty is among the few utilities still left with merchant generation businesses. Exelon (EXC) has shown its political clout by winning subsidies in Illinois and New York to support what it claims are uneconomic nuclear plants. Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) is angling for similar favors. We don't expect either one to divest its merchant generation business, but investors must watch these carefully.
Similarly, FirstEnergy (FE) is the latest to give up on the merchant generation business. We think it is unlikely that Ohio and Pennsylvania will pass legislation like in New York and Illinois allowing subsidies for its three nuclear plants. This will likely result in bankruptcy for its merchant unit before its next large bond payment in April 2018. Once this uncertainty is resolved, we believe FirstEnergy will be a successful fully regulated utility again.
Top Picks
Dominion Energy (D)
Star Rating: 4 Stars
Economic Moat: Wide
Fair Value Estimate: $85.00
Fair Value Uncertainty: Low
5-Star Price: $68.00
Dominion's investments in Eastern U.S. energy infrastructure should result in wide-moat businesses generating more than 50% of earnings by 2021. Its narrow-moat regulated utilities produce the balance of earnings with operations in states with constructive regulation, industry-leading sales growth, and high-return investment opportunities. In Virginia, Dominion benefits from rate riders; incentive allowed returns on equity; and state legislation that freezes base rates until 2022, a positive with forecast long-term 2% annual usage growth. In addition, Dominion's Marcellus/Utica service territories support investments in wide-moat gas pipelines and the $3.5 billion Cove Point LNG export facility. The 2016 Questar acquisition includes a 2,200-mile interstate pipeline with wide moat characteristics that could provide a decade of additional growth investment. Dominion's growth plans should produce 10% dividend growth if management sticks to its 70%-75% payout target.
Scana
Star Rating: 4 Stars
Economic Moat: Narrow
Fair Value Estimate: $64.00
Fair Value Uncertainty: Medium
5-Star Price: $44.80
Scana's new nuclear project has weighed on the stock for several years. A brief relief rally followed management's decision to cancel the project, but now investors are scared that Scana could have to fund as much as $4 billion of sunk capital. We think the market is too pessimistic. We applaud management for securing the best possible legal and regulatory backstops for a project that could cost some $20 billion. We assume Scana shareholders lose $1 per share of value from concessions to ratepayers as part of our $64 fair value estimate. However, the market is far more punitive, given the nosebleed valuations at which Scana's peers are trading. As nuclear project concerns ease, Scana's 20% discount to peers should shrink.
Veolia Environnement (Paris: VIE)
Star Rating: 3 Stars
Economic Moat: None
Fair Value Estimate: EUR 21.50
Fair Value Uncertainty: Medium
5-Star Price: EUR 15.05
Veolia's resumption of revenue organic growth in the first quarter of 2017 is sustainable and positive for the equity story, in our view. It was fueled by higher growth in waste activity since the beginning of 2010. We expect organic growth of 2% over the full year versus negative 1.2% in 2016. This is slightly below the 3.1% posted in the first quarter, as comps will be less favorable over the next quarters. Still, this organic growth resumption is positive for the equity story, as the disappointment on that front in 2016 weighed heavily on the share price. We think Veolia is particularly attractive relative to peer Suez. Veolia typically trades at premium multiples to Suez but now trades at a 14% discount P/E. We think Veolia's fundamentals are more appealing than those of Suez with higher ROIC, lower leverage, better capital allocation, and higher dividend growth. Veolia increased its 2016 dividend 10%, and we assume that the firm will continue to increase it by 9% per year on average through 2019, versus 2% for Suez.
More Market Outlooks
Stock Market Outlook: China Rebalancing Presents Winners and Losers
Credit Market Insights: A Solid Quarter for the Bond Markets
Basic Materials: Valuations Propped Up by Shaky China Fundamentals
Communication Services: Smaller Rivals Call the Shots in U.S. Wireless
Consumer Cyclical: Tepid Mall Traffic Could Constrain the All-Important Holiday Season
Consumer Defensive: Valuations More Reasonable After Third-Quarter Retreat
Energy: All Roads Point to Oversupply in 2018
Financial Services: Banks Can't Rest Easy
Healthcare: Stock Selection Key as Valuations Rise
Industrials: Worldwide Growth Is Resilient, But Valuations Look Full
Real Estate: Enter With Caution
Technology: Valuations Painting Overly Rosy Scenarios
M&A Outlook: High Prices Impede Dealmaking in the U.S.
Private Equity Outlook: Larger Funds, Larger Deals
Venture Capital Outlook: Exits Come Into Focus as Valuations Continue to Climb
U.S. Stock Funds: Steady as She Goes
International-Stock Funds: The Beat Goes on
Bond Funds: A Period of Relative Calm
Travis Miller does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.