Skip to Content
Test alt text


What’s Behind the Rise of Direct-Sold 529 Plans?

Morningstar research shows that fee-based advisors are increasingly favoring cheaper direct-sold 529 plans.

By Madeline Hume, Morningstar Research Services LLC

Read Time: 4 Minutes

As families grapple with the rising costs of college, they’re increasingly turning to 529 college savings plans to help fund their children’s education.

That movement pushed the 529 market to an all-time high in December 2019, when assets approached $328 billion before the coronavirus sell-off caused it to fall to around $293 billion as of March 31, 2020.

Chart comparing the assets under management for direct-sold 529 plans and advisor-sold plans.

Concurrently, there has been a long-term shift away from solely commission-based advisory businesses and toward fee-based compensation. For instance, the 2019 Morningstar Survey of Advisors showed that 47% of advisors identified as fee-based, while 37% identified as commission-based.

One key reason for the trend toward direct-sold plans is that advisors who have a fee-based business model have greater flexibility to choose the best plan available for their clients, regardless of the distribution channel.

As a result, cheaper, direct-sold 529 plans have become increasingly popular with these cost-conscious fee-only financial advisors.

Indeed, direct-sold plans continue to drive the lion’s share of 529 asset growth: On average, Morningstar's 529 College Savings Plan Landscape report showed that direct-sold plans grew by 7.3% per year from December 2015 through March 2020, while advisor-sold plans (mostly offered by commission-based advisors) grew by only 2.8% over the same period.

Here, we take a closer look at how advisor-sold and direct-sold 529 plans have evolved in that time.

Why Are Fees for Direct-Sold 529 Plans so Much Lower?

Even as overall assets in 529 plans have grown, there’s still a wide gap between fees charged for direct-sold and advisor-sold plans.

For an age-based portfolio—the most popular investment option for college savers—the average fee in direct-sold 529 plans was 0.35% at the end of 2019, compared with 0.87% in advisor-sold plans.

There are a couple of reasons for this fee gap:

  • Plans sold through an advisor cater specifically to financial advisors who receive commissions based on the funds in which their clients invest. These commissions tend to drive fees higher in advisor-sold plans’ age-based portfolios, regardless of the type of underlying funds the portfolios use.
  • There are differences in the types of funds typically found in advisor-sold versus direct-sold age-based portfolios. The teams behind advisor-sold plans tend to favor actively managed funds—which charge higher prices—while direct-sold, age-based options heavily favor low-cost index funds.

The chart below plots age-based portfolios according to their average total expense ratio and their average percentage of underlying funds that are actively managed.

Chart comparing expense ratios for advisor-sold and direct-sold 529 plans.

The tracks plotted at the top right of the chart, which include age-based portfolios with higher fees and higher use of actively managed funds, are more often distributed through advisors.

Nearly 60% of age-based, direct-sold plans primarily use index funds, while less than 15% of age-based, advisor-sold portfolios do. Because advisor-sold plans include fewer options that track indexes, investors in those plans often end up with higher-cost options.

How We’re Rating 529 Direct-Sold vs. Advisor-Sold Plans Amid Evolving Lineups

In light of these different fee inputs and distribution channels, under our current rating system, we determined the Price Pillar ratings of different 529 plans by comparing advisor-sold plan fees relative to one another and direct-sold plan fees relative to one another.

But as advisor compensation methods have evolved, the lines between fees for the two plan types have become more blurred. Considering this, along with the increased prevalence of fee-based advisors, we will continue to evolve and improve upon our approach to evaluating 529 plan fees.

Direct-sold 529 plans are adapting their lineups to attract fee-based advisors, increasing their comparability to advisor-sold plans.

For instance, Utah’s my529 has a web portal for fee-based advisors and has adapted its lineup by adding customizable options, which gives advisors greater flexibility without clogging their lineups with static options that might confuse do-it-yourself investors.

As direct-sold 529 plans become more flexible, college savers working with a financial advisor can consider all their options rather than limiting themselves to plans that pay financial advisors a commission.

Our research at Morningstar has consistently found that lower-fee investments are likely to outperform higher-fee investments over time. So, in situations where two plans’ management teams and processes are roughly equivalent, the lower-cost option has the clear edge, regardless of whether the underlying funds are active, passive, or a mix of both.

Glide path designs aside, to keep up with the typically cheaper direct-sold plans, the underlying active managers commonly seen in advisor-sold plans must collectively outperform their respective benchmarks—a possible, though difficult, task.

We enhanced the methodology used to evaluate mutual funds in November 2019. A key differentiator of the updated approach is that it assigns ratings at the share-class level.

Previously, we assigned the same rating to all share classes of a fund, but now a fund’s costlier share classes often receive lower ratings than its cheaper share classes. Considering this, along with the increased prevalence of fee-based advisors, we will continue to evolve and improve upon our approach to evaluating 529 plan fees.

Read more in Morningstar’s latest 529 College Savings Plan Landscape research report.

Important Disclosures

The information, data, analyses, and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete, or accurate.

The opinions expressed are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice. Except as otherwise required by law, Morningstar shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages, or other losses resulting from, or related to, the information, data, analyses, or opinions or their use. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of Morningstar and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, or used in any manner, without the prior written consent of Morningstar.

Investment research is produced and issued by subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc. including, but not limited to, Morningstar Research Services LLC, registered with and governed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.