4 Short-Term Bond Funds That Proved Their Mettle in 2018
Obstacles throughout 2018--particularly rising interest rates and anxious credit markets--provided a challenge to bond investors broadly, but short-term bond funds held their own.
2018 Was a Litmus Test
After a couple of years lagging many other more-aggressive bond categories, short-term bond funds were relatively strong performers in what proved to be a difficult environment for bonds in 2018. The most obvious influence through most of the year was the Federal Reserve’s slow and steady hiking of short-term interest rates. In the second half of the year, pressure on the credit markets increased further, as expectations for U.S. economic growth and inflation were pared back. Even though yields rallied in the last two months of the year, short still trumped intermediate for the full year; the broad short-term bond Morningstar Category delivered 0.92%, while the broad intermediate-term bond Morningstar Category lost 0.50%.
A second and related phenomena was that the yield curve continued to flatten during 2018. As my colleague Miriam Sjoblom pointed out in early 2018, a flattening yield curve narrows the additional yield that an investor is getting paid to take interest-rate risk, so from a fundamental perspective, short funds begin to look more attractive. This happened over the course of the year, as the Federal Reserve tightened monetary policy by raising interest rates four times: in March, June, September, and December. The yield curve flattened considerably, and the spread between the 10-year and 2-year U.S. Treasury tightened, from 54 basis points at the start of the year to 21 basis points at close. Also, by definition, short-term bond funds have less duration, or interest-rate risk, than many longer-maturity-focused options, and this structural characteristic was a significant boon to performance over the course of the year. In short (an intentional pun), investors weren’t giving up that much more yield by not taking additional interest-rate risk.
Emory Zink does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.