Skip to Content

Schwab's Kleintop: History Suggests Little Long-Term Market Impact From a Russia Incursion

We don’t believe that diversified investors need to take actions to protect portfolios from the market risks tied to potential invasion in Ukraine.

The following is an excerpt of an article originally published on by Jeffrey Kleintop.

Russia’s buildup of military forces around Ukraine is larger in scope than the exercises of March 2021 and echoes the Russian invasions in Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014. As in 2014, both the U.S. and NATO have communicated that they are not considering the deployment of their forces to Ukraine to repel a Russian invasion.

The human costs of military action are unmeasurable. Yet, the stock market reaction to an incursion or invasion of Ukraine may echo those of the past with little measurable impact for diversified investors. Previous incidents involving Russia had little impact to the markets. Most similarly, Russia’s invasion and subsequent annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 saw the S&P 500 and other developed and emerging markets around the world dip less than 2% on the day it occurred and rebound at least partially during the following five days.

Historical Geopolitical Events involving Russia enter image description here *Turkey is a member of NATO, now and at the time of the event. Source: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and FactSet. Data retrieved 1/28/2022. All price performance is in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Russia has very small equity exposure in the global indexes, making up only 3.2% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and just 0.4% of the global stock market measured by the MSCI AC World Index. Ukraine has no exposure in either index.


Any sustained market impact could be influenced by economic sanctions imposed on Russia.

The United States has discussed with its allies measures that include cutting off Russia’s largest financial institutions from global transactions to hurt Russia’s businesses and imposing an embargo on American-made technology to exert pressure on Russia’s military and its consumers. But there isn’t unanimous support for these measures among U.S. allies. Russia is the U.S.’s 30th largest trading partner—that is pretty far down the list. But that isn’t true for Europe. Russia is Europe’s 5th largest trading partner—and accounts for 40% of the Europe’s gas imports.

Trade relationships enter image description here Source: Charles Schwab, US Census Bureau, European Commission, Data for 2020 retrieved as of 1/28/2022.

European officials worry that the proposed U.S. sanctions might prompt Russia to retaliate by cutting off natural gas and oil flows to Europe, something Russia has done previously to exert its influence. Europe is very dependent upon Russia for its energy supplies and has not been able to build up its reserves for the winter heating and energy demands. While both the U.S. and Qatar have already stepped-up production to meet increasing shortages, supplies remain tight.

Instead of U.S.-led sanctions, a key lever for sanctions in Europe may be Germany’s willingness to halt the certification of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline should there be an invasion of Ukraine. The Nord Stream 2 bypasses Ukraine in its delivery of natural gas from Russia to Europe, depriving the country of the approximately $2 billion in annual transit fees Russia currently pays to use the first Nord Stream pipeline. These tariffs contribute to the Russia-Ukraine hostilities. The Nord Stream 2 pipeline construction was finished in September, but German regulators have yet to issue the final legal permission Russia needs to begin operations. Germany’s new Chancellor, Olaf Scholtz, has said he may not approve it if Russia invades Ukraine.

Impact of sanctions

Russia has taken steps in recent years, such as building up foreign currency and gold reserves (Source: Central Bank of the Russian Federation) and bolstering relationships with China, to minimize the impact of financial and trade sanctions on its economy after being subjected to them for almost a decade.

  • The 2014 sanctions imposed by the Obama administration on Russia, after its invasion of Crimea, remain in effect.
  • Additional sanctions imposed by the Trump administration after Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election remain in place.
  • Further sanctions were applied by the Biden administration in 2021 after the SolarWinds cyberattack, which exposed data from both the U.S. government as well as hundreds of American companies.

Any further sanctions imposed are unlikely to have meaningful economic impact on the U.S., due to limited economic exposure. There has been little impact on the U.S. economy from the sanctions listed above. U.S. exports to Russia are primarily agricultural and are unlikely to have any measurable impact on the U.S. market indexes.

In Europe, the main economic impact is likely through energy prices. However, a lot of the impact to energy prices may be already priced in from politically motivated Russian supply cuts last year. Oil and gas prices have soared in Europe over the past year and are contributing to inflation and weighing on growth. To counteract this, the government in France, and others in Europe, have put freezes on consumer energy prices to try to lessen the impact.

Natural gas prices in Europe enter image description here Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 1/31/2022.

European growth is set for a strong pace in 2022 at 3.9% according to the International Monetary Fund, despite the risks that include high energy prices. This should lend support to European stocks, especially with price-to-earnings multiple for the MSCI Europe Index which is in line with the 20 year average, in contrast to the still historically high valuations for U.S. stocks represented by the S&P 500. So far this year, European stocks have outperformed the U.S. market. A risk to continued outperformance is that the higher natural gas prices climb, the more utilities in Europe may struggle to quickly pass on those costs to consumers.


On the surface, there seem to be similarities between Russia invading Ukraine and China’s threats to invade Taiwan. But, they are fundamentally different, and we should not assume anything about one from the other.

Unlike the situation in Ukraine, a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would most likely bring China’s industry to a halt as semiconductor shipments flatline and might invoke a sympathetic backlash in other Chinese territories and may bring global military action from Taiwan’s allies that are also dependent upon its manufacturing output. Additionally, Taiwan seems unwilling to make moves toward independence that would provoke China. A June 2021 survey conducted by Taiwan’s National Chengchi University showed that only 31% support independence—not enough to empower Taiwan’s leaders to break away from China, despite the impression given by the recent headlines. Most in Taiwan support the status quo, which is China’s preference.

Survey: Taiwan Independence vs. Unification enter image description here Source: Election Study Center, National Chengchi University

The kinds of events that could likely push China to take military action against Taiwan include:

  • A formal declaration of independence by Taiwan (unlikely given the limited support for independence noted above).

  • The end of negotiations surrounding unification by all of Taiwan's main political parties (unlikely since the Chinese Nationalist Party in Taiwan has a friendly stance toward the mainland).

  • Formal defense agreements with Taiwan signed by Western allies (possible, but the United States currently does not have such an agreement with Taiwan).

  • The widespread acceptance of Taiwan as a country and/or equal partner in multiple international organizations, like the United Nations (50 years ago the United Nations admitted the People’s Republic of China and expelled Taiwan, re-entry is not likely in the near-term).

None of these appear to be on the verge of happening.


We don’t believe that diversified investors need to take actions to protect portfolios from the market risks tied to potential invasion in Ukraine.

Michelle Gibley, CFA®, Director of International Research, and Heather O’Leary, Senior Global Investment Research Analyst, contributed to this report.

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Investing involves risk including loss of principal. International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.

Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. For additional information, please see

Commodity-related products, including futures, carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors Commodity related products may be extremely volatile, illiquid and can be significantly affected by underlying commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations and economic conditions regardless of the length of time shares are held.

(0122-2SXU) Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.