Skip to Content
Risk & Behavior

Would Men and Women Manage Windfall Investment Options Differently?

Our study explores how each gender would advise friends to handle windfall investments

Financial-behavior studies frequently suggest a difference between the behavior of women versus men. For example, studies like Odean’s and Barber’s “ Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment” found that men’s tendency toward overconfidence bias prompts them to trade more excessively than women, resulting in lost returns. On the other hand, studies concerning women’s financial behavior often find that women tend to be more risk-averse and take on more conservative investments, sometimes to their own detriment. 

Our research suggests that these faux pas in financial behavior are not a result of lack of knowledge. Rather, many studies have found that investors tend to make the biggest financial mistakes in situations where emotions are running high. But in a low-pressure scenario, both men and women choose fairly optimal investing decisions. 

Investors—both men and women—do know better

In our study, we presented individual investors with a situation in which a friend asked them for financial advice. In this scenario, the friend is 51 years old, has an annual income of $60,000, and recently received a windfall of $20,000. The friend wants to analyze this windfall investment option but isn’t sure how to get started. We asked participants to give the friend advice by selecting one of the following options: 

  • Hire a financial advisor 
  • Ask friends and family for advice 
  • Do research on the Internet and make their own investment decisions 
  • Invest in a simple index or target-date fund 

The results suggest that both women and men would give optimal advice with only slight variations. Most investors advised their friend to talk to an advisor or invest in a target-date fund instead of doing research on their own or asking friends and family for advice—two activities connected to common biases and financial mistakes. In short, women and men do not significantly differ when it comes to giving optimal advice, as illustrated on the chart below.  

*We conducted a chi-square and proportion test and found that the differences in the selections, not between genders, are statistically significant.

Why aren’t people following their own advice?

These results raise the question of why investors still make financial mistakes, like overtrading or taking on too little risk, even though they intellectually know the right thing to do. Simply put, it’s because investors are human beings and are prone to behavioral biases that lead them astray when making investing decisions.

For example, they may be prone to recency bias—a tendency to overvalue the events that happened most recently—which can lead to behavior such as chasing after returns. Or they may experience overconfidence bias, which can prompt them to make risky decisions, like trying to time the market.

One way advisors can work with clients to combat these natural tendencies is to act as behavioral coaches and help clients manage their emotions when making investing decisions. This study again demonstrates that advisors can make a great impact by steering their clients in the right direction when their emotions get in the way of their logic.

To learn more about our gender-related research, download “Gender Bias in Asset Allocation Advice: How Eliminating Possible Sources Might Point the Way to a Solution.”
Get My Copy

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.