Skip to Content
Investing Trends

The Best HSA Investment Accounts in 2018

Three plans stand out for investing HSA dollars to save for future medical costs

We've published new research. Read highlights from our 2019 assessment of HSA providers.

Our 2018 Health Savings Account Landscape Report evaluates and ranks 10 of the largest health savings account, or HSA, plans available to individuals assuming two distinct use cases: HSAs as a spending vehicle to cover current medical costs, and HSAs as an investment vehicle to save for future medical expenses.

The HSA investment account appeals to individuals who will pay for medical costs out of pocket and intend to invest their HSA contributions to achieve long-term growth. Investing HSA dollars allows individuals to maximize the unrivaled tax benefits offered by HSAs. Often known as the triple tax advantage, contributions into HSAs are tax-deductible, investment growth and interest are tax-exempt, and withdrawals avoid taxes as long as they’re spent on qualified medical expenditures. The tax benefits outweigh what’s offered by a 401(k), a traditional IRA, a Roth IRA, or a 529 college savings plan.

How we assessed the best HSA investment accounts

We considered five components of HSA plans in assessing their merits as investment vehicles:

  1. Menu design: In our view, HSA plans’ investment menus should offer investment options in all core asset classes while limiting overlap among options.
  2. Quality of investments: Here, we measure the attractiveness of the underlying investments by leveraging our Morningstar Analyst Ratings for funds. The Analyst Rating indicates which strategies Morningstar analysts expect to outperform peers and benchmarks on a risk-adjusted basis over the long haul.
  3. Price: Our price calculations aggregate three common fees paid by HSA investors: maintenance fees, investment fees, and underlying fund fees. We assumed an investment account balance of $15,000, which is average for the industry,
  4. Performance: Performance measures how well a plan's current underlying fund lineup has fared on a risk-adjusted basis over the long haul.
  5. Investment thresholds: Many plans require participants to keep $1,000 or $2,000 in the checking account before they can invest. This can create an opportunity cost for HSA investors, so we favor plans without investment thresholds.

We consider price to be the most important component in evaluating the best HSA investment accounts, as it’s the most significant differentiator among plans.

The best HSA investment accounts

The HSA Authority, Bank of America, and Further received Positive assessments for use as an investing vehicle. The HSA Authority stands out as the most attractive, because it has strong investments that we expect will outperform over time, charges lower fees than all other plans that we evaluated, and doesn’t require investors to keep money in the checking account before investing. We believe Bank of America and Further also represent strong options, but neither plan stacks up to The HSA Authority in our opinion primarily because they aren’t quite as inexpensive.

UMB Bank, Fifth Third, Optum, BenefitWallet*, and HealthSavings Administrators earned Neutral assessments. Each plan offers some attractive features, such as attractive investment options, well designed investment menus, or first-dollar investing. However, they all levy fees that look about average versus the other plans we evaluated.

HSA Bank and HealthEquity** received Negative assessments owing to high fees and investment thresholds that require accountholders to keep either $1,000 or $2,000 in the checking account before investing.

Best HSA Plans

Please see below for important disclosure.

To learn more, download our latest evaluation of HSA providers.
Get My Copy

The information we evaluated in our report came from HSA plan websites and call centers as of Sept. 30, 2018.

*BenefitWallet overhauled its investment lineup on Nov. 1, 2018. We evaluated HSA plans using information they disclosed on their websites and call centers as of Sept. 30, 2018. If we had evaluated BenefitWallet’s new investment roster, the plan’s quality of investments score would have increased to Positive, but its overall assessment would have remained Neutral.

**After we published our report, HealthEquity informed us that it offers an account which waives maintenance fees once assets reach $2,000. Based on our research, that wasn’t evident from the firm’s website or call center as of Sept. 30, 2018. However, if we factored that into our analysis, the plan’s price score and overall assessment would have increased to Neutral.

Important Disclosure

The information, data, analyses and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. The opinions expressed are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice. Except as otherwise required by law, Morningstar shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages or other losses resulting from, or related to, the information, data, analyses or opinions or their use. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of Morningstar and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, or used in any manner, without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Investment research is produced and issued by subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc. including, but not limited to, Morningstar Research Services LLC, registered with and governed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Morningstar Analyst Rating™ is not a credit or risk rating. It is a subjective evaluation performed by Morningstar’s manager research group, which consists of various Morningstar, Inc. subsidiaries (“Manager Research Group”). In the United States, that subsidiary is Morningstar Research Services LLC, which is registered with and governed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Manager Research Group evaluates funds based on five key pillars, which are process, performance, people, parent, and price. The Manager Research Group uses this five pillar evaluation to determine how they believe funds are likely to perform relative to a benchmark, or in the case of exchange-traded funds and index mutual funds, a relevant peer group, over the long term on a risk-adjusted basis. They consider quantitative and qualitative factors in their research, and the weight of each pillar may vary. The Analyst Rating scale is Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. A Morningstar Analyst Rating of Gold, Silver, or Bronze reflects the Manager Research Group’s conviction in a fund’s prospects for outperformance. Analyst Ratings ultimately reflect the Manager Research Group’s overall assessment, are overseen by an Analyst Rating Committee, and are continuously monitored and reevaluated at least every 14 months. For more detailed information about Morningstar’s Analyst Rating, including its methodology, please go to

The Morningstar Analyst Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating a fund, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause the Manager Research Group’s expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what they expected, and (iii) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the fund.