Skip to Content

19 Best Healthcare Companies to Invest In

These companies largely earn their competitive advantage from intangible assets, and their stocks are great choices for an investor’s watchlist.

These companies stand out from the competition and can be good choices for long-term investing.

The strongest long-term opportunities for healthcare companies primarily fall in three industries: drug manufacturing, medical devices, and diagnostics and research.

And all 19 of the best healthcare companies to invest in have intangible assets that provide a wide moat against competitors. This intangible-asset advantage is often derived from either patents or proprietary technology.

Patents are temporary government licenses that exclude competition from copying an invention. For example, in pharmaceutical companies, patents are necessary owing to the ease with which some drugs can be replicated. Similarly, patents are vital in the medical device industry to protect companies’ product designs.

Proprietary technology encompasses more complex processes and tools than a company’s patents might cover—many companies keep their intellectual property as a trade secret rather than provide a public description in a patent application. In general, the more sophisticated and customized a product or service becomes, the more that proprietary technology plays a role in driving competitive advantage. In healthcare, this is seen in biopharma, medical devices, and contract research organizations.

Here, we highlight the 19 healthcare companies that made our list of the Best Companies to Own in 2024. These companies earned their spot on the list by carving out wide moats and making smart capital decisions.

Because this list is built for the long term, rather than to identify presently undervalued companies, it may not be the right time to buy all these names. Rather, we believe these healthcare companies are strong choices for an investor’s watchlist.

You should consider buying only when they’re trading below our price/fair value estimate, which assesses whether a stock’s price is high or low compared with its fundamental value.

Company Name
Ticker
Industry
Moat Source — Cost Advantage
Moat Source — Efficient Scale
Moat Source — Intangible Assets
Moat Source — Network Effect
Moat Source — Switching Costs
Agilent TechnologiesADiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
Thermo Fisher ScientificTMODiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
WatersWATDiagnostics and ResearchNoNoYesNoYes
AstraZenecaAZNDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Bristol-Myers SquibbBMYDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Gilead SciencesGILDDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
GSKGSKDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Johnson and JohnsonJNJDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
MerckMRKDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
NovartisNVSDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
PfizerPFEDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
Roche HoldingRHHBYDrug Manufacturers—GeneralNoNoYesNoNo
SanofiSNYDrug Manufacturers—GeneralYesNoYesNoNo
HaleonHLNDrug Manufacturers—Specialty and GenericYesNoYesNoNo
ZoetisZTSDrug Manufacturers—Specialty and GeneralYesNoYesNoNo
StrykerSYKMedical DevicesNoNoYesNoYes
Zimmer Biomet HoldingsZBHMedical DevicesNoNoYesNoYes
ColoplastCLPBYMedical Instruments and SuppliesNoNoYesNoYes
West Pharmaceutical ServicesWSTMedical Instruments and SuppliesNoNoYesNoYes

Intangible Assets Give Drug Manufacturers Their Edge

All the drug manufacturers on the best companies list, both general and specialty, gain an edge from their intangible assets.

Pfizer PFE is a prominent member of the group. “Pfizer’s patent-protected drugs carry strong pricing power that enables the firm to generate returns on invested capital in excess of its cost of capital,” writes Morningstar director Damien Conover. “The patents give the company time to develop the next generation of drugs before generic competition arises.”

Johnson & Johnson JNJ, the world’s largest and most diverse healthcare firm with a market cap of $348 billion as of April 17, 2024, also thrives in this area. Conover notes that Johnson & Johnson’s wide moat is “supported by intellectual property in the drug group … and strong brand power from the consumer group. Despite carrying some lower-margin divisions, J&J maintains strong pricing power and has posted gross margins above 70% during the past four years, validating its strong competitive position.”

Ten of the 19 companies with a moat driven by intangible assets have an additional moat source, either a cost advantage or a high switching cost.

Switching Costs Aid the Medical Device and Diagnostic Industries

Of the five qualifying companies in either the diagnostic and research or medical devices industries, all have an advantage from intangible assets and also benefit further from switching costs.

With a market cap of $210 billion as of April 17, 2024, Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO is the largest of the diagnostics and research companies on the list. Thermo Fisher sells scientific instruments and laboratory equipment, diagnostics consumables, and life science reagents.

Like key competitors Agilent A and Waters WAT, Thermo Fisher’s analytical instrument business benefits from intangible assets and switching costs, says Morningstar’s director of European equity research Alex Morozov. “The intangible asset is the firm’s differentiated technology and its leadership positions within tools such as mass spectrometry, chromatography, microscopy, and others. … The business is also rather sticky, particularly within the biopharma end market, where the regulatory process assures high switching costs. Production methods have to stay uniform throughout the lifecycle of a drug, which often extends beyond the lifecycle of a typical mass spectrometer.”

Medical devices, for their part, have high switching costs because surgeons develop expertise in using a differentiated set of tools and device systems have component parts that are designed to work together.

“The highest switching costs in medical devices is in orthopedics, where all the device makers have their own differentiated implants and the tools to install the implants,” says Morningstar senior analyst Debbie Wang.

“It takes years for the orthopedic surgeons to become practiced enough on one vendor’s tools and implants to deliver optimal patient outcomes, and after they have mastered them, they are reluctant to switch to another vendor where they’d have to relearn some of it,” Wang explains. “For this reason, the switching costs are the highest for companies like Zimmer Biomet ZBH and Stryker SYK.”

2 Top Medical Instruments and Supplies Companies

The medical instruments and supplies subindustry ties with specialty and generic drug manufacturers for the fewest representatives on our list: just Coloplast CLPBY and West Pharmaceutical Services WST.

Coloplast is the market leader in ostomy and continence care, holding 40% of the global market share. “Though ostomy products do benefit from some protection of intellectual property, we think the moat is also rooted in sticky end-user relationships,” Morningstar’s Wang notes.

West Pharmaceutical Services, for its part, is the global market leader in primary packaging and delivery components for injectable therapeutics. The company has two moat sources: intangible assets and switching costs. As for the latter, Morningstar strategist Karen Andersen notes: “Any component that comes in direct contact with a drug product must be written into the drug application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and remains on file for the life of the product. Practically, this means West remains the primary packaging provider for the entire time a drug remains on the market.”

Find the full list of companies and read about our selection methodology.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

More in Stocks

About the Authors

Emelia Fredlick

Senior Editor
More from Author

Emelia Fredlick is a senior editor for Morningstar. She works to reach individual investors through featured digital content experiences that bring Morningstar research to life.

Before joining Morningstar in 2019, Fredlick spent four years in content marketing for financial-services clients' wealth management and small-business segments.

Fredlick holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from Emory University.

Benjamin Slupecki

Associate Equity Analyst
More from Author

Ben Slupecki, CFA, is an associate equity analyst for Morningstar Holland BV, a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc. Based in Amsterdam, he covers the energy sector.

Before joining the equity research team, Slupecki was a Morningstar data journalist in Chicago for two years starting in 2020. Before joining Morningstar in 2019, Slupecki worked as an equity research intern for Riverwater Partners in Milwaukee.

Slupecki holds a bachelor’s degree in finance, investment, and banking and marketing from the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Business. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

Sponsor Center