JPMorgan Developed International Value C holds a quantitatively derived Bronze Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating reflects that it has scored better than the norm on factors Morningstar research associates with future outperformance relative to category peers.
People: High
The People Pillar assessment is based on quantitative measures of manager experience, track record, and alignment. Over periods of up to 10 years, the successful manager experience metric, calculated across the actively managed strategies the manager has run over that period, ranks within the top 10% of peers. Separately, we measure risk-adjusted excess return by analyzing managers' information ratios over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. It ranks within the top 10% of peers across the evaluated periods. Reported manager investment in the strategy is over USD 1 million, something our analysis indicates is correlated with better long-term performance.
Process: High
The Process rating is driven by the fund's gross-of-fee information ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted excess return. It consistently ranks within the top 10% of peers over one, three, and five years. The parent firm's risk-adjusted success ratio, which measures the share of its equity funds that outperform peers, ranks slightly above peer firms over 10 years.
Performance (in US Dollar)
Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan Developed International Value C share class returned 37.4%, underperforming its category index, the MSCI ACWI Ex USA Value NR USD Index (37.7%), but outperforming its Morningstar category peers (33.1%). Across 10 years, the fund returned 9.6% per year, mirroring the index (9.5% per year) while outperforming its Morningstar Category average (9% per year).
Price
JPMorgan Developed International Value C's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 1.5% per year. It places it in the most expensive quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Foreign Large Value Category, where the median fee is 0.87% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of -1.98, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.