Skip to Content

What to Do When You Get a Raise

These three saving rules can help you stay on track with your financial plan.

Many American households are behind when it comes to saving for retirement. And while it seems obvious that making more money could solve the problem, the reality is far messier: Raises--and how we spend them--can actually make it more difficult to retire comfortably.

How can earning more money make it harder to meet your retirement goal? It comes down to three main factors:

1. Lifestyle creep 2. Fixed assets 3. Constant saving rates

The Problem: Lifestyle Creep and Static Existing Assets Most of us tend to increase our standard of living as our income increases: That's to be expected. But that new standard of living translates into a new level of expenses, which stays with us over time. What starts off as a weekend splurge on dining out soon becomes a weekly affair. That nice place that once seemed out of reach is now your home--and the mortgage comes with it. That's lifestyle creep.

With increased income, our retirement need increases proportionally--we’d like to maintain (at least part) of our new standard of living in retirement. And, if we maintain a constant savings rate, increased income also means increased savings. So, the good news is that we’re saving more money.

Despite our now-larger contributions, our existing retirement savings don’t grow. And, for Americans with higher incomes, Social Security benefits don’t grow either. Social Security has tiers of benefits. For the lowest earners, it provides 90% of the average annual contribution. But for people who earn more, it provides 90% on the first $11,520 of their income, then drops to 32% for income between $11,520 and $69,420, and to 15% on income between $69,420 and $132,900. For high income earners, the first $132,900 in income gets taxed to support Social Security, and nothing afterward. Accordingly, high income earners only receive social security based on their income below $132,900.

Relative to our new retirement need, effectively everything we’ve saved to date (or earned via Social Security contributions) shrinks.

Moreover, many who intend to increase their savings rate as income increases do not. According to an analysis we conducted using data from a major U.S. recordkeeper, people tend to keep their savings rate constant.

Exhibit 1 shows what happens for a 47 year old who received a big salary bump from $100,000 to $120,000 and saved a constant 11% of her salary. Although she had been on track to meet her retirement need before the raise, she is now falling behind.

Thankfully, this is fixable.

The Solution: Save More. How Much More Depends on Your Personal Characteristics We wanted to determine how much of a raise a person needs to save in order to fund an equivalent raise in retirement. For example, if one's current standard of living increases by $5,000 per year, how much is needed to fund a similar raise in retirement?

Using a nationally representative sample of American households from the 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances, we created a model to determine how much of a 5% raise a person should save to ensure his retirement income continues that lifestyle change. We used this model to test the effectiveness of three guidelines:

1. Spend twice your years to retirement. If you are going to retire in 15 years, spend 30% of your raise and save the remaining 70% for retirement. 2. Save your age as a percentage of the raise. If you are 50 years old, save 50% of the raise. 3. Save at least 33% of your raise. If your take-home income increased by $1,000, save $333 of that new income.

The “spend twice your years to retirement” rule has the highest success rate overall. However, it also requires the most saving and may be difficult for those with little discretionary income. On the other hand, both the “save your age” rule and “save at least 33%” rule are good for investors under 45, but they fall short as the person ages. Not surprisingly, older investors must save more than their raise to fund their new standard of living in retirement. Because they are closer to retirement, these investors have less time to accumulate savings and less time in the market to generate returns--the “spend twice your years to retirement” rule is up to the challenge; the others aren’t.

More Money, More Problems The primary lesson from this research is clear: After celebrating your new income, think about how that higher income may impact your expectations in retirement and, thus, your financial plan. Most investors may need to increase their savings rate to avoid a drop in their standard of living in retirement. Although these guidelines are good starting points for investors, getting a raise is a perfect time to meet with a financial advisor or do a detailed analysis yourself, making the necessary changes to your financial plan based on our personal situation.

More in Financial Advice

About the Authors

Samantha Lamas

Senior Behavioral Researcher
More from Author

Samantha Lamas is a behavioral researcher at Morningstar. She is a recipient of the Montgomery-Warschauer Award for her research in financial planning.

Lamas' research focuses on investor engagement and the factors that drive people's decision-making about investing and money. Her work delves into how people think about their financial goals, what they look for when seeking financial advice, and what kinds of mental shortcuts people use when making decisions about their personal finances.

Lamas joined Morningstar in 2016 as a product consultant working directly with the individual investor and advisor audience segments before moving into a research role.

Lamas holds a bachelor's degree in business with a concentration in finance from Dominican University. Follow Lamas on Twitter at @SamanthaLamas4 and on LinkedIn.

Email Samantha at Samantha.Lamas@morningstar.com.

Steve Wendel

More from Author

Steve Wendel is head of behavioral science for Morningstar, where he leads a team of behavioral scientists and practitioners who conduct original research to help people invest and manage their money more effectively. Before assuming his current role in 2015, he was principal scientist for HelloWallet, a company that specializes in web and mobile financial wellness programs, where he studied savings behavior and coordinated the research efforts of HelloWallet’s advisory board. Morningstar owned HelloWallet from 2014 to 2017.

His latest book, Improving Employee Benefits, shows HR practitioners how they can use behavioral economics to help employees to take action on their benefits. In 2013, he published Designing for Behavior Change, which describes HelloWallet’s step-by-step approach to applying behavioral economics and psychology to product design.

Wendel holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Berkeley, a master’s degree from The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, and a doctorate from the University of Maryland, where he analyzed the dynamics of behavioral change over time.

Wendel is also the founder of the Action Design Network, a nonprofit organization that teaches members how use behavioral economics and psychology in product design. The network hosts more than 5,000 behavioral practitioners at events around the country, including the annual Design for Action Conference. Follow Steve on Twitter: @sawendel

Sponsor Center