In Defense of Closet Indexers
They are no worse (or better) than other forms of active management.
Last week, the Financial Times whacked closet-index funds--actively managed funds that hold portfolios that look suspiciously like stock indexes. The FT’s article was sparked by an academic paper titled, "Indexing and Active Fund Management: International Evidence," which examined global fund markets. The paper found that closet-index funds were "prevalent" in all major fund markets.
The FT headlined that observation as representing a “gigantic mis-selling phenomenon.” A London Business school professor stated that closet indexing “is the active fund management’s dirty little secret. In some countries, where investors are more trusting and less questioning, the secret is well kept.” The chief executive of the Swedish Shareholders Association went further, calling on regulators to ban closet index funds that have annual expense ratios of more than 0.8%.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.