The Biggest Mutual Fund Surprises of 2012
Some funds had dramatic comebacks, while others remained cellar-dwellers.
Some funds had dramatic comebacks, while others remained cellar-dwellers.
We all saw this coming today, right? A huge rally in Europe, robust gains in U.S. stocks, and strong returns in bonds? Ha.
Some individual fund performances were surprising, too. Let’s take a look at some of the good and bad surprises of the year. I’ll skip over the funds where managers are nominated for manager of the year as we already covered that ground. All the 2012 returns you see quoted are through Dec. 28.
From Worst to First
Buying or selling based on the results of one year is a bad idea. Fairholme (FAIRX) and Schneider Small Cap Value are great illustrations of that. They had great returns in 2010, appalling losses in 2011, and awesome gains again in 2012. Focused funds tend to have big swings because a few stocks can play such a big role in returns. When they are focused deep-value funds like these two, those swings are magnified.
Financials are a key part of the story for both as the sector rallied smartly. Fairholme has a 33.6% gain for the year to date and Schneider has a 34.4% gain. This is not to suggest these two are identical twins. Fairholme held up wonderfully in 2008 thanks to Bruce Berkowitz’ wariness of banks and fondness of cash, while Schneider had a big bet on some of the shakiest mortgage companies--and you can guess how that went.
From Worst to Worst
I’m so old I can remember when momentum funds were really hot and cutting-edge. Man, does that seem like a long time ago. For starters, momentum funds really struggled in the bear markets of 2000-02 and 2008. They got hurt in the first sell-off because that one was about multiple compression. They tanked in 2008, because the mortgage crisis moved faster than individual company numbers and their momentum models were too slow to keep up.
To make matters worse, momentum funds got caught flat-footed in the debt crisis in 2011 and--unlike Fairholme and Schneider Value--they tripped up again in 2012. For example, Turner Midcap Growth lost 8.4% in 2011 but gained only 3.8% in 2012. Brandywine Blue (BLUEX) lost 10.3% in 2011 and gained a mere 5.1% in 2012, giving it three bottom-decile performances in the past four years. There were a few exceptions, though, such as AQR Momentum (AMOMX), which produced a nice 15.2% gain this year.
A Good Year for Unpopular Funds
Fairholme wasn’t the only unpopular fund that had a strong year. The three most heavily redeemed funds in 2011 all produced top-quartile returns. American Funds Growth Fund of America (AGTHX) was hit with $33 billion in outflows, but it returned 18.6% in 2012. Amazon.com (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), and Gilead Sciences (GILD) led the fund to a strong year.
American Funds Capital World G/I A (CWGIX) shed $9 billion to outflows in 2011 but it gained 17.9% this year, as names like Bayer AG (BAYRY) and Home Depot (HD) helped it to a good year.
Fidelity Diversified International (FDIVX) rebounded from a sluggish stretch as some of Bill Bower’s European stocks like Sanofi (SNY) and Anheuser-Busch Inbev (BUD) were big winners. Not bad for a fund that shed $7.7 billion in assets in 2011.
New Manager, Big Returns
You wouldn’t think that a year when a fund changes managers would be a great time to invest. But Third Avenue Value (TAVFX), which had a fairly smooth manager transition, had a good year in 2012, as did Putnam Equity Income (PEYAX), which had a jarring manager change.
Third Avenue had long prepared for Marty Whitman to step down from management. Ian Lapey became a comanager in 2009 at Third Avenue Value after eight years at the firm. That’s not to say you couldn’t tell there had been a change. After Whitman stepped back on March 1, 2012, Lapey quickly cut down the fund’s huge bet on Hong Kong real estate in order to reel in risk a bit--not because he didn’t like the stocks. In fact, the Hong Kong names had a strong year as did some of the fund’s financials. The fund’s 26.3% gain for 2012 marks a welcome rebound from a poor 2011.
At Putnam Equity Income, Bart Geer left to join BlackRock, and the firm handed the fund to Darren Jaroch and Walter Scully in late August. The two are Putnam veterans who aim to boost the fund’s yield and focus further up the market-cap ladder. The fund has finished the year nicely, though I won’t attempt to parse the credit for a strong 2012. Some of its big winners, such as Marathon Petroleum (MPC) and Comcast (CMCSA), have been in the portfolio for a while.
A Bit of Divergence at Primecap
Primecap Odyssey Aggressive Growth (POAGX) focuses on small- and mid-cap stocks, while the other Primecap funds favor large caps, but it still may come as a surprise to some that it had a great 2012 while the rest of the lineup was middling, given that the Primecap funds share a common management team and growth strategy.
Primecap Aggressive Growth has scored big gains through a number of small health-care and biotech stocks, such as Pharmacyclics , which tripled this year. As a result, it's up 19.3% on the year while Vanguard Primecap Core (VPCCX) gained 12.9%. While Core had some nice health-care names like Amgen and Biogen, it didn’t have any triples, and it also had some more sluggish giants like Boeing (BA) and Texas Instruments (TXN).
FundInvestor Newsletter | ||
Want to hear more from the mutual fund experts? Subscribe to Morningstar FundInvestor for exclusive research, coveted analysis and proprietary ratings—neatly packaged and delivered to your inbox. | One-Year Digital Subscription 12 Issues | $125 Premium Members: $115 Easy Checkout |
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.