The government is trying to rein in Medicare Advantage costs. Will it work?
By Alicia H. Munnell
Keeping healthcare costs under control is crucial for retirees
Something good happened recently: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that its proposed average increase for 2027 in the rates that Medicare pays insurers for Medicare Advantage plans is projected to be only 0.09%.
Read: Medicare Advantage's once-blistering growth dropped in 2026. Here's what that means.
Analysts had predicted that the 2027 rate increase would be roughly in the range of 4% to 6%, in line with the 5.06% increase insurers enjoyed in 2026.
Read: Why shares of UnitedHealth, Humana and other insurers tanked - and took the Dow with them
This proposal is a big deal because Medicare Advantage plans are a big deal. In 2025, more Medicare participants received their benefits through a Medicare Advantage plan offered by a private insurer than through government-run traditional Medicare, a share that is projected to continue rising over time (see Figure 1).
People gravitate toward Medicare Advantage plans for three reasons:
-- 1. Enhanced benefits, such as dental, vision, hearing and fitness.
-- 2. A limit on annual out-of-pocket costs for Part A and B services (unlike traditional Medicare).
-- 3. Low or zero premiums.
In return, enrollees must accept the plans' procedures, such as prior authorization for accessing care, and more limited networks of healthcare providers. On balance, however, it's clear why older people often opt for Medicare Advantage plans.
Read: Most Medicare Advantage plans are free upfront. You still might not be able to afford one.
The big problem, however, is that Medicare Advantage plans are really expensive for Medicare. Congress's Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that payments for Advantage beneficiaries in 2025 were 20% higher than for traditional Medicare.
While Medicare usually pays for services that participants actually receive, the program pays Medicare Advantage plans a fixed amount per enrollee. That amount is tied to local benchmarks - higher for plans with higher ratings, and risk-adjusted to reflect the health status of each plan's enrollees.
Because Medicare Advantage plans receive higher payments for less healthy enrollees, insurers have an incentive to identify as many health conditions as possible for each enrollee. Not surprisingly, Medicare Advantage plans record more health conditions than traditional Medicare for comparable beneficiaries.
Analysts attribute this pattern, at least in part, to "chart reviews," which insurers use to determine whether the individual's medical records are consistent with the information submitted by the provider. While chart reviews may identify an additional factor that could impact a person's health status, they can also identify diagnoses that are inaccurate, no longer active or unrelated to the clinical care, and therefore not relevant for payment purposes.
In 2022, 62% of Medicare Advantage enrollees had a chart review, and these reviews were significantly more likely to add a diagnosis than remove one.
CMS's announcement to hold steady 2027 payments to Medicare Advantage plans reflects the agency's plan to update its risk-adjustment model to better reflect current costs. A key part of that effort involves excluding from the calculation diagnosis information from chart reviews that is not associated with a specific beneficiary encounter.
CMS will accept comments on the proposed payment increase through Feb. 25, before publishing its final rate increases on or before April 6. Clearly, this decision will have the largest impact on the companies that have relied the most extensively on chart reviews (see Table 1).
CMS has taken a bold step; let's hope the agency sticks with it. Keeping healthcare costs under control is crucial for the economic security of current and future retirees.
-Alicia H. Munnell
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
02-23-26 1243ET
Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.The articles, information, and content displayed on this webpage may include materials prepared and provided by third parties. Such third-party content is offered for informational purposes only and is not endorsed, reviewed, or verified by Morningstar.
Morningstar makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any third-party content displayed on this site. The views and opinions expressed in third-party content are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Morningstar, its affiliates, or employees.
Morningstar is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or delays in this content, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Users are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent financial advice before making any decisions based on such content. The third-party providers of this content are not affiliated with Morningstar, and their inclusion on this site does not imply any form of partnership, agency, or endorsement.
Popular
4 Stocks to Buy for the Long-Term While They’re Still Undervalued
Are TIPS ETFs the Best Way to Fight Inflation?
What’s Ahead for Stocks This Quarter—and Where to Invest
10 Best Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for the Long Term
