'The small, regional bank business model is unalterably broken,' says Oppenheimer analyst after New York Community Bancorp stock swoon
By Steve Gelsi
Chris Kotowski sees diversified banks winning out in the U.S.'s 'bizarrely fragmented banking system'
Oppenheimer banking analyst Chris Kotowski said this week's big stock dive by New York Community Bancorp Inc. and the subsequent swoon of regional-bank stocks demonstrates the value of larger, diversified banks.
"The NYCB debacle proves out the big bank business model," Kotowksi said in a research note on Friday that looked back at the domestic banking business and its evolution since the 1980s.
Also read: Bank stocks rise from lows after New York Community Bancorp triggers worst swoon since Silicon Valley Bank collapse
"The small, regional bank business model is unalterably broken," Kotowski said. "The sooner the small banks get consolidated the better for us all. The big banks actually have a pretty darn good and resilient business model."
Kotowski said he continues to favor seven bigger banks that he highlighted in a research note from earlier this week: Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Morgan Stanley (MS) and U.S. Bancorp. (USB).
Also read: Goldman Sachs, Jefferies stand out among undervalued big banks, Oppenheimer says
Regional banks have a larger exposure to commercial real estate, which has left them vulnerable in the current office space downturn, Kotowski said.
In the case of New York Community Bancorp Inc. (NYCB) has about 73% of its loan portfolio with some or all ties to real estate, after it acquired distressed Signature Bank last year.
Its loan portfolio in the New York area also includes exposure to multi-family homes with rent regulations as a reality of the local market.
"It just illustrates why small, regional narrow banks are inherently undiversified and in our view a generally flawed business model," Kotowski said.
To be sure, big banks will face some losses on their office portfolios, he said.
"The nature of having a diversified portfolio is that there will always be losses somewhere on something," Kotowski said. "This year it will likely beoffice, in other years it has been energy, in others farmland. There will always be something."
But he argued that having a larger footprint will avoid the possibility of having one thing kill a business.
Kotowski said the sell-off in larger banks this week on the heels of New York Community Bancorp was overblown, and said the sector remains undervalued.
Also read: Morgan Stanley upgrades Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Citi on 'lightened up' Basel III capital requirements
-Steve Gelsi
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
02-02-24 0853ET
Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.-
Markets Brief: Is It Really a Surprising Quarter for Earnings?
-
After Earnings, Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock a Buy, a Sell, or Fairly Valued?
-
For Bond Investors, Delayed Rate Cuts Demand a Different Playbook
-
What’s Happening In the Markets This Week
-
How the Tokyo Stock Exchange Is Pushing for Better Shareholder Returns
-
Magnificent 7 Stocks Earnings Updates: AI Remains the Focus
-
Where We See Opportunities After an Ugly Month for Stocks
-
After Earnings, Is Alphabet Stock a Buy, a Sell, or Fairly Valued?
-
Berkshire Hathaway Earnings: Strong Insurance Results Continue to Lift Revenue and Profitability
-
10 Questions for Berkshire Hathaway’s 2024 Annual Meeting
-
After Earnings, Is Ford Stock a Buy, a Sell, or Fairly Valued?
-
3 Dividend Stocks for May 2024
-
Amgen Earnings: Obesity Drug Update Is Highly Encouraging
-
What’s Going on With Apple, Tesla, and Alphabet?
-
Apple Earnings: A Weak 2024, but Optimism for 2025
-
4 Utility Stocks to Play the AI Data Center Boom