Family of Disabled Quadriplegic Greek Woman Pleads with Government of Cyprus to Release ICSID Award Needed for Her Care
Family of Disabled Quadriplegic Greek Woman Pleads with Government of Cyprus to Release ICSID Award Needed for Her Care
Investment dispute between Greece and Cyprus arose out of countries’ financial crises; Cyprus denied exemption for family to historic bail-in for Cypriot banks, and continues to balk at ICSID judgment in family’s favor
The family of a severely disabled, quadriplegic Greek woman is pleading with the government of Cyprus to release nearly €5 million awarded to the family in March by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), a ruling that the Cypriot government has thus far refused to honor.
The family has appealed directly to Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides and attorney general George L. Savvides of Cyprus to release the funds, which are needed for round-the-clock care of their daughter, who suffered irreversible brain damage at the age of three as the result of a botched medical procedure.
The ICSID tribunal has stated publicly that “the validity of and duty to comply with an award are clear.” Yet, the Cypriot government continues to drag its feet, in violation of its obligations under international law.
In July – four months after the ICSID ruling – Cyprus moved to have the family’s award annulled via the outlandish claim that the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between Greece and Cyprus, which dates from the early 1990s, was “inoperative” during the investment dispute. In reality, the BIT was fully in effect.
The case is captioned Adamakopoulos and others v. Cyprus (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/49). Claimants are represented by Grant & Eisenhofer, along with Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check; Kyros Law; Fietta; and Chrysthia Papacleovoulou. The government of Cyprus is advised by Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle.
London-based Stephen Fietta KC, one of the lawyers representing the family, said that Cyprus’s annulment application against a family with demonstrated humanitarian needs “shows that Cyprus’ pathological hostility to investment arbitration, and thus to its treaty obligations to international investors, knows no bounds.”
The investment dispute was sparked by the Greek debt crisis and subsequent Cyprus banking collapse in 2012-13. Investors in Cyprus’s Laiki Bank and Bank of Cyprus alleged that their funds were illegally confiscated during the €10 billion bail-in of the Cypriot banking system. As opposed to a government- and taxpayer-funded bailout, a bail-in forces investors, depositors, and other stakeholders to provide funding to recapitalize a bank. ICSID registered the case in 2015.
Although Cyprus exempted many charities from the bail-in, it bluntly denied this family’s request for a humanitarian exemption, and then fought vigorously to avoid returning the much-needed funds to the family. The ICSID tribunal found that the conduct of the government of Cyprus failed to provide the family fair and equitable treatment, in violation of international law.
“Cyprus is refusing to swallow the bitter pill of losing its ICSID fight, and spitefully holding hostage an ill and permanently disabled young woman—all over a comparatively small amount of money in the grand scheme,” explained John Kyriakopoulos of Kyros Law in Athens, who is also representing the family.
“The Cypriot government’s technical and legalistic arguments have been routinely rejected, and this fruitless vindictiveness stains the honor and integrity of an otherwise respectable member of the EU,” added Grant & Eisenhofer senior counsel Alice Cho Lee. “We again urge President Christodoulides and his government to release the funds properly and legally awarded to the family, and so urgently needed.”
For more background on this case, please see here: https://icsid.worldbank.org/cases/case-database/case-detail?caseno=ARB/15/49.
Allan Ripp
646.285.1779
aripp@rippmedia.com
James Bourne
jimbournenyc@aol.com
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260818145339/en/
The articles, information, and content displayed on this webpage may include materials prepared and provided by third parties. Such third-party content is offered for informational purposes only and is not endorsed, reviewed, or verified by Morningstar.
Morningstar makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any third-party content displayed on this site. The views and opinions expressed in third-party content are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Morningstar, its affiliates, or employees.
Morningstar is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or delays in this content, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Users are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent financial advice before making any decisions based on such content. The third-party providers of this content are not affiliated with Morningstar, and their inclusion on this site does not imply any form of partnership, agency, or endorsement.
Popular
4 Stocks to Buy Before They Rise Further
The 10 Best Companies to Invest in Now
14 Elite Funds and ETFs, and 5 Popular Funds That Just Missed the Mark
2 Undervalued Stocks to Buy Before They Rebound