Skip to Content
Morningstar

T. Rowe Price International Eq Index PIEQX Sustainability

Morningstar Medalist Rating
| Medalist Rating as of | See T. Rowe Price Investment Hub

Sustainability Analysis

Author Image

Sustainability Summary

 | Published as of .  Based on data as of

T. Rowe Price International Eq Idx Fd may not appeal to sustainability-conscious investors.

T. Rowe Price International Eq Idx Fd's holdings are exposed to average levels of ESG risk relative to those of its peers in the Global Equity Large Cap category, thus earning it an average Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 3 globes. Competing funds in the category with ratings of 4 or 5 globes have less ESG risk in their holdings. ESG risk measures the degree to which material environmental, social, and governance issues, such as climate change, biodiversity, human capital, as well as bribery and corruption, could affect valuations. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about driving positive environmental and social outcomes for society’s benefit.

T. Rowe Price International Eq Idx Fd has an asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 8.2, indicating that its companies have low exposure to carbon-related risks. These are risks associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy such as increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and stranded assets.

One potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that T. Rowe Price International Eq Idx Fd doesn’t have an ESG-focused mandate. A fund with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes.

Currently, the fund has 12.4% involvement in fossil fuels, which is roughly in line with 11.1% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. The fund exhibits moderate exposure (7.04%) to companies with high or severe controversies. Controversies are incidents that have a negative impact on stakeholders or the environment, which create some degree of financial risk for the company. Examples of types of controversies include bribery and corruption scandals, workplace discrimination and environmental incidents. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. Such controversies can also damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.

Author Image

ESG Commitment Level Asset Manager

 | Basic , 

A genuine effort despite some shortcomings.

T. Rowe Price incorporates environmental, social, and governance criteria into its fundamental research process because it believes they impact an investment’s risk/return profile. The firm has long focused on matters of corporate governance but has paid more attention to social and environmental issues over the past decade. It signed the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment in 2010, incorporated third-party ESG data into the research process in 2014, and developed in-house ESG research capabilities in 2017. The firm has grown its responsible investing and governance teams to support the broadening of its effort, which now total more than 20 members combined.

In 2018, the firm developed a proprietary ratings system to underpin its sustainable-investing effort. The model supplements third-party ESG data from numerous vendors with its own data sets, culminating in a multitiered ESG rating for a given company. While portfolio managers aren’t compelled to avoid companies with potential ESG concerns, they must consider them and meet with the firm’s responsible-investing team quarterly to review their portfolios. Directors of research and a central ESG committee oversee ESG implementation. The firm could be more transparent by making ESG data for its numerous mutual funds easily accessible for investors. T. Rowe Price has the resources and scope to be an influential advocate of sustainability, but its reluctance to vote in favor of key ESG issues and vague proxy-voting and engagement policies are key drawbacks. In each of the last three proxy seasons, the firm voted for less than half of key ESG resolutions as defined by Morningstar. T. Rowe Price prefers to engage companies through board letters and private meetings rather than through public-facing methods. The firm’s engagement guidelines stop short of clear directives on topics such as decarbonization targets and instead let company management address issues as it sees fit. Aside from advocating more detailed and standardized ESG disclosures from companies, T. Rowe Price lacks meaningful sustainability goals in its proxy-voting policy.