JPMorgan Short Duration Bond A holds a quantitatively derived Bronze Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating reflects that it has scored better than the norm on factors Morningstar research associates with future outperformance relative to category peers.
People: Above Average
The People Pillar assessment is based on quantitative measures of manager experience, track record, and alignment. Over periods of up to 10 years, the successful manager experience metric, calculated across the actively managed strategies the manager has run over that period, ranks slightly above peers. Separately, we measure risk-adjusted excess return by analyzing managers' information ratios over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. It ranks slightly above peers across the evaluated periods. Reported manager investment in the strategy is over USD 1 million, something our analysis indicates is correlated with better long-term performance.
Process: Above Average
The Process rating is driven by the fund's gross-of-fee information ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted excess return. Over one, three, and five years, it ranks within the top 10% of peers, above peers, and above peers, respectively. The parent firm's risk-adjusted success ratio, which measures the share of its fixed income funds that outperform peers, ranks slightly above peer firms over 10 years.
Performance (in US Dollar)
Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan Short Duration Bond A share class returned 3.7%, matching its category index, the Bloomberg US Govt/Credit 1-3 Yr TR USD Index (3.7%), but underperforming its Morningstar category peers (4.4%). Across the 10-year period, the fund returned 2.1% per year, mirroring the index (2.1% per year) but underperforming its Morningstar Category average (2.3% per year).
Price
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond A's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.59% per year. It places it in the middle quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Short-Term Bond Category, where the median fee is 0.52% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of -0.23, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.