Skip to Content

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Income C JSRCX

Medalist Rating as of | See JPMorgan Investment Hub
  • NAV / 1-Day Return 14.06  /  0.14 %
  • Total Assets 1.1 Bil
  • Adj. Expense Ratio
  • Expense Ratio 1.340%
  • Distribution Fee Level Below Average
  • Share Class Type Level Load
  • Category Target-Date Retirement
  • Investment Style Large Blend
  • Credit Quality / Interest Rate Sensitivity Medium / Moderate
  • Status Open
  • TTM Yield 1.65%
  • Turnover 17%

Morningstar’s Analysis JSRCX

Medalist rating as of .

A solid series in many respects, but our confidence has taken a hit.

Our research team assigns Neutral ratings to strategies they’re not confident will outperform a relevant index, or most peers, over a market cycle.

A solid series in many respects, but our confidence has taken a hit.

Senior Analyst Greg Carlson

Greg Carlson

Senior Analyst


The JPMorgan SmartRetirement mutual fund series boasts clear advantages with a well-resourced target-date team and thoughtful retirement research that impacts the series' glide path, such as the recent integration of its SmartSpending retirement-income approach. But an extended period of stumbles on the tactical allocation front amid market volatility tempers our confidence to a degree, driving a downgrade of some share classes' Morningstar Analyst Ratings. The two cheapest share classes earn Bronze ratings while the other six earn Neutrals.

Over the past year, J.P. Morgan has woven the methodology of its JPMorgan SmartSpending mutual fund series into post-retirement vintages of four target-date series under Morningstar coverage. The move cements J.P. Morgan's status as a research leader in the target-date space. The firm devised SmartSpending to help investors fund discretionary spending throughout retirement by dynamically orbiting around the long-term risk profile of a blended 40%/60% MSCI ACWI/Bloomberg Aggregate Index. It is geared for the investor to sell off shares of the investment annually. This approach requires active involvement from retirement plan participants to draw down their savings--no given in the set-it-and-forget-it world of target-date funds--but the team cut its teeth researching the behavior of plan participants, and we remain confident that it can execute.

Veterans such as lead manager Dan Oldroyd head this effort. He served as deputy to former lead skipper Anne Lester from 2010 through May 2020. He's still backed by experienced personnel in the primary areas of focus--retirement research, tactical allocation, and manager selection. That said, Lester’s departure was a significant blow, and there has been other turnover as well.

The team also had a previous history of making savvy tactical allocation calls. However, the team's calls detracted value in the market volatility of 2018, 2019, 2021, and the first half of 2022. At times the series has missed out on equity rebounds by being too conservative. But it was also overweight stocks coming into 2022, which hurt in the early stages of this year's bear market. The team hasn’t necessarily lost its ability to make correct calls--it added value in 2020's up-and-down market—but these issues bear watching.

Rated on Published on

J.P. Morgan's dive into retirement income is steeped in research that takes real participants into account.

Senior Analyst Greg Carlson

Greg Carlson

Senior Analyst


Above Average

The series boasts a clear edge on this front. However, our confidence in the team’s tactical allocation approach has moderated to a degree, meriting a downgrade of the series’ Process rating from High to Above Average.

The incorporation of SmartSpending into the glide path marks the most significant adjustment to this series since its inception, but the team has a history of thoughtful changes. Such adjustments are rooted in the pioneering participant research the team has conducted all along. The team’s crucial partnerships with outside parties such as Chase retail bank have spurred insights into participant behavior, including its finding that retirees’ spending is most volatile during early years and tapers off later on. The target-date franchise recently adapted its post-retirement allocations to account for this insight, aiming to fund investors’ withdrawals until age 100.

The team also had a long history of making savvy tactical allocation calls. However, the team’s calls detracted value in the market volatility of 2018, 2019, 2021, and the first half of 2022. At times the series has missed out on equity rebounds by being too conservative. But it was also overweight stocks coming into 2022, which hurt in the early stages of the bear market. The team hasn’t necessarily lost its ability to make correct calls--it added value in 2020’s up-and-down market—but these issues bear watching.

In March 2022, J.P. Morgan merged SmartSpending 2020 JTQLX into JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2020 JSSRX and started investing all four 2020 vintages across series according to the SmartSpending methodology. The team now calibrates allocations throughout the year, managing to a short-term volatility target that resets annually to fund investors’ spending in retirement. In the long run, the team expects volatility to land close to a 40% equity/60% bond custom index.

For investors who retired around 2015, JPMorgan SmartSpending 2015 JTQDX rebranded as JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2015. The legacy Income strategies for all four series remains live, but participants have to opt in.

In 2021, lead manager Dan Oldroyd found that suppressed wage growth and increased spending rates have depressed retirement savings, which led him to boost equity exposure by 3 percentage points to 94% for young investors. The glide path’s landing point also rose by 7.5 percentage points to 40% in stocks, modestly flattening the glide path overall.

The team seeks to add additional value through careful manager selection and an established tactical-allocation process. With about $128 billion in assets, even after the market decline, the target-date franchise isn’t as nimble now, which could limit the team’s ability to implement its tactical views.

Rated on Published on

J.P. Morgan’s target-date team has shed some depth, but still boasts experienced personnel.

Senior Analyst Greg Carlson

Greg Carlson

Senior Analyst


Above Average

It earns an Above Average People Pillar rating.

Dan Oldroyd took the reins of the team in mid-2020 when longtime lead manager Anne Lester retired. Lester drove much of the team’s research agenda, and SmartSpending was her creation. Oldroyd had served as Lester’s comanager nearly since the series’ 2006 launch and drove the integration of SmartSpending into the series’ glide path after her departure. And he has veterans to rely on in regard to retirement research, tactical allocation calls, and manager selection.

That said, the team has seen enough key departures to raise doubts as to whether it is still a top-tier group in an increasingly competitive industry. Two portfolio managers, Michael Schoenhaut and Eric Bernbaum, moved to the firm’s target risk group in 2019, and Katherine Roy, a key person within the retirement research group, left in 2022 to join another firm. That said, Ove Fladberg, a veteran of the firm’s target-risk group, was added as a portfolio manager in 2022 and Roy’s role should be filled soon.

Oldroyd and comanager Silvia Trillo also reap the benefits of J.P. Morgan’s standout multi-asset solutions group, numbering more than 100, and J.P. Morgan’s wide array of building blocks. (The team can choose from more than 100 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.) Fairly strong funds fill the resulting lineup: The mutual fund series of SmartRetirement holds 43% of its assets in Morningstar Medalists as of June 2022.

Rated on Published on

A well-resourced, thoughtful, and disciplined steward of client assets, JPMorgan Asset Management maintains an Above Average Parent rating.

Associate Director Emory Zink

Emory Zink

Associate Director


Above Average

As of 2022, this investment stalwart manages more than USD 2.5 trillion in AUM. Composed of various global cohorts and diverse asset classes, the firm has more tightly integrated its capabilities in recent years, notably through the development of proprietary analytical and risk systems. Investment teams are robustly staffed and helmed by seasoned contributors. The firm’s strategies tend to produce reliable portfolios, and several flagship offerings are Morningstar Medalists. Manager incentives align with fundholders'; compensation reflects longer-term performance factors, and portfolio managers invest in the firm’s strategies as part of their compensation plans.

The firm’s funds tend to be well-priced, but they aren’t as competitive as many highly regarded peers of similar scale. Recent product launches include thematic and single-country strategies, both of which carry the potential for volatile performance and flows, along with misuse by investors. The firm remains intrepid when it comes to developing an environmental, social, and governance-focused framework and continues to move into other areas such as direct indexing through its 55iP acquisition and China through its joint venture, but these complicated initiatives take time to assess any real and lasting effect.

Rated on Published on

This series has hit an extended rough patch that has diminished its record, but it still has outperformed peers over the very long term.

Senior Analyst Greg Carlson

Greg Carlson

Senior Analyst


Over the 15-year period through August 2022, every vintage of the I share class ranks in the top half of its Morningstar Category on total return and Sharpe ratio(a measure of risk-adjusted return). However, just half of the vintages have bested their respective S&P Target Indexes on those measures during the period. And the series’ record is just average or worse versus peers over periods of 10 years or less.

Tactical calls are difficult to get right on a consistent basis, and even the sharpest allocators suffer bouts of underperformance. J.P. Morgan is no exception, and its tactical signals struggled throughout 2018, 2019, 2021, and the first half of 2022. Over the trailing five years, each vintage’s total returns trail more than 60% of each fund’s respective peer group on average.

Over longer periods, attribution from J.P. Morgan shows tactical decisions have delivered mixed results—they contributed 0.04-0.12 percentage points of return annually over the past decade through June 2022, but were neutral dating back to the series’ 2006 inception. Manager selection was roughly neutral over those periods.

Published on

It’s critical to evaluate expenses, as they come directly out of returns.

Senior Analyst Greg Carlson

Greg Carlson

Senior Analyst


The share class on this report levies a fee that ranks in its Morningstar category’s costliest quintile. Such high fees stack the odds heavily against investors. Based on our assessment of the fund’s People, Process and Parent pillars in the context of these fees, we don’t think this share class will be able to deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, explaining its Morningstar Analyst Rating of Neutral.

Published on

Portfolio Holdings JSRCX

  • Current Portfolio Date
  • Equity Holdings 0
  • Bond Holdings 1
  • Other Holdings 21
  • % Assets in Top 10 Holdings 87.6
Top 10 Holdings
% Portfolio Weight
Market Value USD

JPMorgan Core Bond R6


JPMorgan Core Plus Bond R6


JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity R6


JPMorgan US Equity R6


JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF


JPMorgan High Yield R6


Jpmorgan Us Govt Mmkt Fund Im Shares (Restricted)

Cash and Equivalents

JPMorgan International Equity R6


JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF


JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF