JPMorgan Strategic Income Opports R5 holds a quantitatively derived Silver Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating reflects that it has scored well on factors Morningstar research associates with future outperformance relative to category peers.
People: Average
The People Pillar assessment is based on quantitative measures of manager experience, track record, and alignment. Over periods of up to 10 years, the successful manager experience metric, calculated across the actively managed strategies the manager has run over that period, ranks slightly below peers. Separately, we measure risk-adjusted excess return by analyzing managers' information ratios over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. These rank slightly below peers, slightly below peers, and slightly above peers, respectively. Reported manager investment in the strategy is over USD 1 million, something our analysis indicates is correlated with better long-term performance.
Process: Above Average
The Process rating is driven by the fund's gross-of-fee information ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted excess return. Over one, three, and five years, it ranks slightly below peers, above peers, and above peers, respectively. The parent firm's risk-adjusted success ratio, which measures the share of its fixed income funds that outperform peers, ranks slightly above peer firms over 10 years.
Performance (in US Dollar)
Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan Strategic Income Opports R5 share class returned 3.9%, underperforming both its category index, the ICE BofA USD 3M Dep OR CM TR USD Index (4.2%), and its Morningstar category peers (5.4%). Across the 10-year period, the fund returned 3.4% per year, surpassing the benchmark (2.5% per year) and Morningstar Category average (3% per year).
Price
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opports R5's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.6% per year. It places it in the cheapest quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Nontraditional Bond Category, where the median fee is 1.16% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of 2, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.