JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I holds a quantitatively derived Neutral Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating suggests the model does not express a clear expectation of outperformance or underperformance relative to peers over a full market cycle.
People: Average
The People Pillar assessment is based on quantitative measures of manager experience, track record, and alignment. Over periods of up to 10 years, the successful manager experience metric, calculated across the actively managed strategies the manager has run over that period, ranks slightly above peers. Separately, we measure risk-adjusted excess return by analyzing managers' information ratios over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. It ranks below peers across the evaluated periods. Reported manager investment in the strategy is over USD 1 million, something our analysis indicates is correlated with better long-term performance.
Process: Average
The Process rating is driven by the fund's gross-of-fee information ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted excess return. Over one, three, and five years, it ranks within the bottom 10% of peers, within the bottom 10% of peers, and slightly above peers, respectively. The parent firm's risk-adjusted success ratio, which measures the share of its equity funds that outperform peers, ranks slightly above peer firms over 10 years.
Performance (in US Dollar)
Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I share class returned 28.5%, underperforming both its category index, the Morningstar US Small TR USD Index (31.8%), and its Morningstar category peers (35.1%). Across the 10-year period, the fund returned 13.4% per year, surpassing the benchmark (10.6% per year) and Morningstar Category average (11.3% per year).
Price
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.99% per year. It places it in the middle quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Small Blend Category, where the median fee is 0.93% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of -0.38, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.