JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF BBCB

Medalist Rating as of | See JPMorgan Investment Hub
Unlocked

Morningstar’s Analysis BBCB

Medalist rating as of .

Our research team assigns Gold ratings to strategies that they have the most conviction will outperform their Morningstar Category average over a market cycle on a risk-adjusted basis.

Morningstar Managed Investment Report
Unlocked by J.P. Morgan Asset Management
null Morningstar Automated Analysis

Morningstar Automated Analysis

Summary

JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF holds a quantitatively derived Gold Morningstar Medalist Rating. The rating reflects that it has scored particularly well on factors Morningstar research associates with future outperformance relative to category peers.

People: Average

Note: This share class' People Pillar rating and analysis are inherited from an analyst-covered share class under the same Strategy Provider Company (rolled up to Branding Name) and Morningstar Category Broad Group: JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ HY Corp Bnd ETF (SecID: F00000X4SK).

Process: Above Average

Note: This share class' Process Pillar rating and analysis are inherited from an analyst-covered passive share class which tracks the same index: Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (SecID: F00000ZF5E).

Performance (in US Dollar)

Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF share class returned 2%, outperforming both its category index, the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD Index (1.9%), and its Morningstar category peers (1.9%). Over five years, the fund returned -0.1% per year, matching the index (-0.1% per year) and underperforming its Morningstar Category average (0.1% per year).

Price

JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.04% per year. It places it in the cheapest quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Corporate Bond Category, where the median fee is 0.5% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of 2.28, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.

Rated on Published on
Associate Analyst Brian Paoli

Brian Paoli

Associate Analyst

Process

Above Average

The Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index holds investment-grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bonds with at least USD 300 million in outstanding par value. It excludes a number of bonds, including, but not limited to, those with equity features, contingent capital securities, inflation-linked bonds, and structured notes. Bonds with credit ratings from the lowest two segments of the investment-grade market, or those rated A or BBB, make up over 90% of the fund. The index rebalances on the last business day of each month. It weights bonds by their market value, which cuts back on any unnecessary turnover and limits trading costs.

The portfolio overweights A rated bonds by more than 10% compared with the category average and excludes anything below a BBB rating. This gives the portfolio a higher quality tilt than most of its category peers. It should provide better downside protection during credit shocks or when credit spreads widen.

The average effective duration of the fund runs a little higher than the category average and makes it more sensitive to interest rate changes. That may enhance the fund’s performance during stressful periods if interest rates get cut. However, a higher duration also means the fund may suffer deeper declines than its peers when interest rates increase. Overall, a higher average duration and higher credit quality reflect the composition of the corporate bond market.

Industrial, utility, and financial companies represent a majority of the bond issuers in this ETF. Financial firms account for one third of the portfolio. Despite that concentration, the ETF’s 10 largest issuers made up less than 15% of its assets, so it still reasonably spreads its bets. Some of those large firms are major financial institutions such as JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America. Large banks like those are highly regulated and have ample risk controls in place to prevent defaults during major economic downturns.

Note: This share class' Process Pillar rating and analysis are inherited from an analyst-covered passive share class which tracks the same index: Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (SecID: F00000ZF5E).

Rated on Published on
Associate Analyst Brian Paoli

Brian Paoli

Associate Analyst

People

Average

JPMorgan is reorganizing and refining its fixed-income indexing capabilities, setting a positive outlook. But these developments are at an early stage and have caused high turnover among portfolio manager ranks, meriting an Average People Pillar rating.

Mark Willauer recently stepped into the role of global head of systematic portfolio management and implementation. He is tasked with building out the systematic fixed-income team and broadening its portfolio optimization techniques. Adding specialized index-tracking infrastructure and personnel should improve the team’s ability to replicate index performance. Its team-based approach reduces key-person risk, and tying compensation to tracking targets aligns the team’s incentives with investors.

Despite carving out a new niche, the team still benefits from the significant resources afforded to J.P. Morgan’s fixed-income unit. Custom tools, a global trade desk, and a deep bench of sector analysts back up its indexing capabilities.

Note: This share class' People Pillar rating and analysis are inherited from an analyst-covered share class under the same Strategy Provider Company (rolled up to Branding Name) and Morningstar Category Broad Group: JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ HY Corp Bnd ETF (SecID: F00000X4SK).

Rated on Published on
Principal Alyssa Stankiewicz

Alyssa Stankiewicz

Principal

Parent

High

J.P. Morgan continues to build a track record of strong stewardship, supporting a Parent rating upgrade to High from Above Average.

With more than USD 4 trillion in assets under management (including USD 1.3 trillion in money market funds) and a broad reach, J.P. Morgan is among the largest active asset managers in the US, Europe, and Asia. Although some multi-asset offerings have struggled over the past five years, prompting new leadership to make changes to investment teams, its equity and fixed-income teams boast long-tenured portfolio managers who practice repeatable investment processes that have generally produced strong long-term results. Most of its funds are core building blocks with long lifetimes, though its lineup around the world also includes more-specialized options: Two options-based equity-income exchange-traded funds, launched in 2020 and 2022, are now among the firm’s largest. J.P. Morgan has been an early mover in offering active ETFs, having converted 12 of its open-end mutual funds to the structure and launching others. It isn’t always at the forefront of emerging trends. While it has filed registration statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission for an interval fund and an ETF investing in private markets, it hasn’t yet introduced such an option for all investors, whether on its own or in partnership with another asset manager, unlike some of its closest competitors.

To support the firm’s diverse investment offerings, J.P. Morgan has invested heavily in both portfolio management tools and its client organization. Over the past 10 years, the firm has developed robust proprietary technology with advanced analytics and broad buy-in from investment analysts, portfolio traders, and portfolio managers, all of whom have easy access to the platform. The firm also stands apart for its demonstrated commitment to clients. In the early 2000s, J.P. Morgan began pivoting its engagement with financial advisors to adopt a more consultative approach, supported by its sought-after Guide to the Markets research series that focuses on investor education, not product pitches. This perspective can help clients stay the course, supporting positive investor outcomes.

Incentives reinforce alignment with fundholders. Beginning more than 10 years ago, investment team compensation is tied to three-, five-, and 10-year performance, and portfolio managers must invest at least half of their deferred compensation in J.P. Morgan strategies. Many firms encourage portfolio managers to invest alongside fundholders, but J.P. Morgan goes a step further in requiring client-facing individuals to invest substantial portions of their incentive compensation in the funds.

Although some funds still face high cost hurdles, more than half of share classes charge competitive fees relative to peers.

Note: This share class' Parent Pillar rating is analyst-driven, as its Branding Name, JPMorgan (Branding Name ID: BN0000095S), is covered by Morningstar Manager Research.

Rated on Published on
null Morningstar Automated Analysis

Morningstar Automated Analysis

Performance

Performance is evaluated in US Dollar, measured to the end of August 2026.

Short-Term Performance

Over the past 12 months, JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF share class returned 2%, outperforming its category index, the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD Index (1.9%), and its Morningstar category peers (1.9%). Over the three-year period, it returned 5% per year, mirroring the index (5% per year) and its Morningstar category peers (5.1% per year).

Long-Term Performance

The fund's five-year annualized return of -0.1% mirrored the benchmark (-0.1% per year) but fell short of the Morningstar Category average (0.1% per year).

Published on
null Morningstar Automated Analysis

Morningstar Automated Analysis

Price

2.28

JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF's Prospectus Adjusted Expense Ratio is 0.04% per year. It places it in the cheapest quintile of the Morningstar US Fund Corporate Bond Category, where the median fee is 0.5% per year. This cost positioning translates into a Medalist Rating Price Score of 2.28, which reflects its relative price positioning within the category. The Price Score ranges from -2.50 (most expensive) to +2.50 (cheapest), with higher scores indicating better cost competitiveness.

Published on

Portfolio Holdings BBCB

  • Current Portfolio Date
  • Equity Holdings —
  • Bond Holdings —
  • Other Holdings —
  • % Assets in Top 10 Holdings 4.5
Top 10 Holdings
% Portfolio Weight
Market Value USD
Sector

HSBC Holdings PLC 5.402%

0.53 262,447
Corporate

Morgan Stanley 3.772%

0.50 250,160
Corporate

Citibank, N.A. 4.838%

0.49 246,807
Corporate

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. 3.45%

0.48 241,531
Corporate

Intel Corporation 1.6%

0.46 227,217
Corporate

JPMorgan US Government MMkt IM

0.46 227,132
Cash and Equivalents

Wells Fargo & Co. 6.491%

0.44 221,828
Corporate

AbbVie Inc. 4.4%

0.44 221,004
Corporate

Morgan Stanley 2.943%

0.43 212,876
Corporate

Wells Fargo & Co. 5.557%

0.42 211,797
Corporate

Sponsor Center