iShares $ Ultrashort Bond ETF's holdings are exposed to average levels of ESG risk relative to those of its peers in the US Fixed Income category, thus earning it an average Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 3 globes. Competing funds in the category with ratings of 4 or 5 globes have less ESG risk in their holdings. ESG risk measures the degree to which material environmental, social, and governance issues, such as climate change, biodiversity, human capital, as well as bribery and corruption, could affect valuations. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about driving positive environmental and social outcomes for society’s benefit.
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond ETF has an asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 8.3, indicating that its companies have low exposure to carbon-related risks. These are risks associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy such as increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and stranded assets. The fund's current involvement in fossil fuels rests at 8.5%, which compares favorably with 14.7% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas.
A potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that iShares $ Ultrashort Bond ETF is not classified by its manager as Article 8 or Article 9 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. Funds classified by their managers as Article 8 or Article 9 either promote environmental or sustainable characteristics or have a sustainable investment strategy, respectively, and hence are more likely to drive positive ESG outcomes. The fund exhibits relatively high exposure (10.09%) to companies with high or severe controversies. Companies with controversies may be involved in incidents such as corruption, employee abuses, and environmental incidents that have a negative impact on stakeholders or the environment. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. In addition, they can damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.