Skip to Content

Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF FLSP Sustainability

| Rating as of | See Franklin Templeton Investment Hub

Sustainability Analysis

Author Image

Sustainability Summary

 

Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF has a number of attributes that may meet the expectations of sustainability-focused investors, despite some issues worthy of attention.

This fund lands in the 10% of strategies with the lowest ESG risk in the Multialternative category, earning it the highest Morningstar Sustainability Rating of 5 globes. ESG risk provides investors with a signal that reflects to what degree their investments are exposed to risks related to material ESG issues, including climate change, biodiversity, product safety, community relations, data privacy and security, bribery and corruption, and corporate governance, that are not sufficiently managed. ESG risk differs from impact, which is about seeking positive environmental and social outcomes.

Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF has an asset-weighted Carbon Risk Score of 8.8, indicating that its companies have low exposure to carbon-related risks. These are risks associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy such as increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and stranded assets.

One potential issue for a sustainability-focused investor is that Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF doesn’t have an ESG-focused mandate. A fund with an ESG-focused mandate would have a higher probability to drive positive ESG outcomes.

Currently, the fund has 16.2% involvement in fossil fuels, which is roughly in line with 14.8% for its average category peer. Companies are considered involved in fossil fuels if they derive some revenue from thermal coal, oil, and gas. The fund has a modest level of exposure (8.18%) to companies with high or severe controversies. Companies with controversies are involved in incidents such as corruption, employee abuses, and that pose some degree of business risks to the company. Severe and high controversies can have significant financial repercussions, ranging from legal penalties to consumer boycotts. In addition, they controversies can damage the reputation of both companies themselves and their shareholders.

ESG Commitment Level Asset Manager