Silk Invest fails to live up to one of the hallmarks of stewardship, manager investment, to help align portfolio manager and shareholder interests. None of the firm’s assets are covered by an invested manager. Open-end and exchange-traded fund fees are a weakness at the firm, contributing negatively to the rating. On average, the firm charges fees on its funds that are in the highest quintile of category peers. With the current market environment of fee compression, this is cause for concern, as investors may flock to alternate asset managers over time to get a better deal. Average tenure of eight years among the longest-tenured managers at Silk Invest is on par with peer firms. In isolation, seasoned teams tend to have more experience to draw upon should they need to weather turbulent market conditions.
In an increasingly competitive industry, Silk Invest falls behind on a number of key metrics, resulting in a Below Average Parent Pillar rating.