Natural Gas Prices at an Unsustainable Low
Two main concerns for investors are overblown.
Dave Meats: After an updated look at supply costs, we have lowered our marginal cost estimate for U.S. natural gas to $2.80 per thousand cubic feet, from $3 previously. But that’s still pretty bullish at current prices--the futures curve is currently averaging only $2.60 per mcf in the next four years. In other words, we think U.S. natural gas prices have fallen to an unsustainable low.
There are two main concerns for investors, and we think both are overblown. First, there’s the idea that associated gas from oil-directed drilling in oil plays like the Permian Basin is flooding the market and pushing down prices. It’s true that associated gas production has grown tremendously in the last 10 years, but it still only accounts for about 25% of all U.S. supply. And there was a 25% decline in oil rig activity in the U.S. last year, which caps associated gas growth in the next year or two. So we still need gas-directed drilling in the U.S., and we don’t think current prices offer enough incentive for producers.
The other big concern for investors is weak global LNG markets. LNG exports are expected to make up around 10% of domestic demand for natural gas in the next few years, and weaker spreads would normally result in lower export volumes and thus lower demand. But in this case we think utilization of U.S. liquefaction facilities will remain above 90%, as it has been in the last few years despite weakening international prices. That’s because U.S. exporters, like our top pick Cheniere Energy, have locked up a large portion of their capacity with take or pay contracts, which means buyers are required to pay for the gas whether they accept delivery or not. And because they already paid for it, they may as well take it, regardless of what price spreads look like at that point in time.
So that drives up demand for natural gas, and U.S. gas producers must collectively raise their output by at least 12% by 2025 to keep the market balanced. But at current prices only the very best acreage is profitable on a full-cycle basis, which is why the gas rig count collapsed during 2019. That means prices must increase to incentive the drilling activity required to balance supply and demand in the next few years. Higher prices should buoy most gas-focused upstream stocks, but as some of the most attractive names also have weaker financial health, we recommend focusing on the midstream exporters instead. The largest of them, Cheniere, is around 30% below our $78 fair value estimate.
Dave Meats does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.