Upstream Energy Stocks Dip Into Attractive Territory
Diamondback Energy and Continental Resources look especially appealing.
Dave Meats: Upstream energy stocks have seen sharp declines in the last couple of weeks, and many are now trading in attractive territory. Sentiment has turned sour on the sector, which has shown extreme volatility recently. These stocks are highly correlated to oil prices, and WTI crude has fluctuated from a high of $76 to a low of $43 in the last year alone. The negativity was exacerbated by the announcement by President Trump that the U.S. will further escalate the Sino-U.S. trade war by adding 10% tariffs to another $300 million dollars worth of U.S. imports from China, which means all Chinese imports will now face import duties. In retaliation, the Chinese government allowed the renminbi exchange rate to slip below 7 for the first time since 2008, making U.S. imports and dollar-denominated crude more expensive in China. But the market's getting carried away. In total, the U.S. will be taxing $600 billion worth of Chinese imports, which is still a small fraction of global trade, valued at least $17 trillion. So, while there is still scope for further downside, we think the impact on global GDP, and indirectly on crude demand, will be modest based on the actions announced to date.
Likewise, the negative reaction to Concho Resources' earnings release also looks overdone. The firm reported weak well results from a 23-well project, testing narrow well spacing. So the test was a failure, but the solution is easy: The firm can revert back to the wider spacing it was using before. At that wider spacing level, we still see multiple decades of low-cost inventory for Concho in the Permian Basin, where it operates. Nevertheless, the slump in shares was severe and contagious--almost every other U.S. shale firm saw a steep decline at the same time. We think this creates a buying opportunity for our favorite low-cost, narrow-moat-rated shale producers. In particular, we highlight Diamondback Energy, ticker FANG, and Continental Resources, ticker CLR. Both have a strong cost advantage due to their high-quality shale acreage, and neither is likely to run out of Tier 1 inventory in the next 10 years.
Dave Meats does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.