A Journey through Emerging Markets' Ups and Downs
Using Morningstar's indexes as platforms, we explore the cyclicality of emerging-markets stock returns over the past decade.
Using Morningstar's indexes as platforms, we explore the cyclicality of emerging-markets stock returns over the past decade.
The recent sell-off in emerging markets has interrupted what had been a nice rebound in 2016. The Morningstar Emerging Markets Index has shed 6% for the one-month ended Nov. 21 (in USD terms). Investors have been selling emerging-markets assets in the wake of sliding local-market currencies and increased fears of trade protectionism under U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. Nonetheless, the index has made strong gains this year; it is up 8.9% for the year to date.
By contrast, the Morningstar Developed Market Index USD has gained just 5.2%. Judging from the Global Market Barometer heat map, Western Europe and Japan have weighed on developed-market returns. Emerging markets across Asia and Latin America have been volatile in recent weeks. But Latin American markets have posted strong gains this year, along with Russia and South Africa.
- source: Morningstar Analysts
Commodity prices, China, and Central Banks (what PIMCO calls "The 3 C’s") have been offered up as explanatory variables. But don’t discount the power of reversion to the mean as a force in its own right.
Consider the cyclicality of emerging markets' versus developed markets' performance in recent years. During the period depicted below, deemed by Morningstar’s manager research team as the "Easy Money Recovery" from the early 2000s' bear market, emerging markets went on an absolute tear. After the TMT bubble burst, there were BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Lesson: Beware investment acronyms!
- source: Morningstar Analysts
Then the financial crisis happened, and emerging markets crashed hard. Though they bounced back in 2009, they struggled mightily in recent years along with other riskier assets. The five-year period between 2011 and 2015 was all about sharp contrasts: developed markets over emerging, large caps over small, growth stocks over value, and quality over junk.
- source: Morningstar Analysts
Unfortunately, investors have not been positioned to reap the full benefits of the emerging-markets rebound. Looking at asset flows for the past few years, Morningstar's global category for emerging markets equity experienced net outflows in 2015, though flows have notably perked up during the 2016 rebound. This means the Morningstar Investor Return (money-weighted) will lag total returns for emerging markets.
- source: Morningstar Analysts
Value-driven asset allocators--including the folks at Morningstar Investment Management--have been keen on emerging markets for some time. As of July 2016, they still saw value in the asset class. At the July 2016 reconstitution for the Morningstar Lifetime Allocation Indexes (a target-date series), Morningstar increased the allocation to emerging-markets equities across index vintages in response to improved long-term expectations.
- source: Morningstar Analysts
The ups and downs of emerging markets over the years have served as a poster child for the cyclicality of asset classes and the power of reversion to the mean. Sticking to a long-term strategic asset allocation and riding out the cycles, or even increasing exposure when the asset class is out of favor, seems to be the winning strategy.
Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc. licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.
Dan Lefkovitz does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.