Skip to Content

Investors Are Once Again Rushing Into SPDR Gold Fund

But this gold-backed ETP doesn't shine quite as brightly as its lower-priced rival.

Gold is traditionally sought after as a store of value in times of severe economic dislocation, an insurance policy against financial Armageddon. Its historically low to negative correlations with most broad asset classes indicate that gold might be a worthwhile investment for a small portion of an investor's portfolio. While gold has exhibited a low level of volatility relative to equities over the past quarter century, the massive price swings experienced from the early 1970s through the mid-1980s--as well as its sharp sell-off in 2013--demonstrate the effects fickle investor sentiment can have on the price of the yellow metal. This type of volatility also underscores why an allocation to gold should probably only occupy a small portion of a well-diversified portfolio. As for an investment in physical gold through an exchange-traded product (ETP), gold ETPs are the least costly, most broadly accessible, and most liquid vehicles for acting upon one's gilded aspirations.

Fundamental View Gold has no intrinsic value. The yellow metal does not produce cash flows that it can share with investors, like equities. Nor does it throw off coupon payments, as a bond does. Financial theory states that a security's intrinsic worth is equal to the present value of the future cash flows it will generate. With no cash flows to project and discount back to today, gold is a purely speculative instrument: It is only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it.

Like most other commodities, such as oil or wheat, gold does not produce cash flow. But unlike most commodities, gold has little practical use. According to the World Gold Council's Gold Demand Trends report for the first quarter of 2016, just 6.3% of gold demand was tied to practical uses--such as dentistry and electronics. The largest source of gold demand (accounting for 37.3% of gold usage in the first quarter of 2016) is typically the jewelry industry. But demand from investors took pole position in the first three months of 2016. During that span, 47.9% of the global appetite for gold could be attributed to investors. The remainder (approximately 8.5%) came in the form of official sector purchases.

The world's central banks have been playing an increasingly important role in the gold market in recent years. In the second half of 2015, the world's central banks bought more gold than any other six-month period in history. Also, investment demand for gold has surged as concerns over paper currencies have flared, interest rates have in some cases gone negative, and the world's most precious metal has been made more accessible to the masses via ETPs. However, until recently, ETP investors had been running for the hills. Holders of gold-backed exchange-traded products had been net sellers for three years. This trend reversed in the first quarter of 2016, when ETPs accounted for a combined 363.7 metric tons of gold purchases.

While demand for gold in practical applications and for jewelry has historically exhibited normal cyclical behavior, investment demand for gold appears to be in a secular uptrend. Gold is now more accessible than ever, and its safe-haven appeal seems to have staying power, which could signal that prices--while far from their peak--have trended too high. On the other hand, bloated sovereign balance sheets and massive bouts of monetary stimulus and negative interest rates have many convinced that gold is the world's one true currency, and perhaps it will only climb higher.

While gold notched record high price levels in nominal terms in September 2011, the nearby peak was well below its inflation-adjusted record price of $2,358 per troy ounce, which was reached in January 1981. Whether the price of gold will tumble or spiral higher is impossible to tell. Though the gold price has demonstrated limited volatility over the past decade, past experience has been marked by episodes of massive price declines, as we've recently been reminded. Nearly two years after the real price of gold hit an all-time record in 1981, its value had fallen by two thirds. What can be said for certain is that gold-backed ETPs are an excellent way to gain exposure for investors and speculators alike.

Portfolio Construction

Simply put,

As far as U.S. federal taxes go, the trust is treated as a "grantor trust," meaning your ownership is taxed as if you owned the gold bullion directly. If you sell within a year of buying, your gains are taxed at ordinary income rates. Beyond a year, bullion, alas, is taxed at a special collectibles rate, which as of writing is 28%.

Fees This fund sells off a little bit of gold over time to offset its 0.40% expense ratio. The trust's sponsor (World Gold Trust Services, which is wholly owned by the World Gold Council) claims an annual fee of 0.15%, while another 0.15% goes to marketing agent State Street Global Markets. The actual fee might be higher if assets under management fall below about $1.2 billion or if "unforeseen expenses" cause the fund's "ordinary expenses" to exceed 0.70% a year--neither is likely.

Alternatives GLD's chief competitor, iShares Gold Trust IAU, also owns gold bullion but has a lower expense ratio of 0.25%. It's the best choice for individual investors who don't need to move millions of dollars on short notice.

ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares SGOL, which charges a reasonable 0.39% expense ratio, represents ownership of gold vaulted in Zurich. If you're worried about catastrophe befalling London, SGOL's lower trading volume may be worth the price.

VanEck Merk Gold Trust OUNZ is a relative newcomer. The trust levies an annual fee of 0.40%. Unlike its peers, the trust allows investors to take delivery of physical gold in an amount as little as one ounce in a variety of forms (coins and bars). The cost involved is significant (a minimum fee applies) and flat-out uneconomical for small amounts.

Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc.'s Investment Management division licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.

More in ETFs

About the Author

Ben Johnson

Head of Client Solutions, Asset Management
More from Author

Ben Johnson, CFA, is the head of client solutions, working with asset-management clients to leverage Morningstar's capabilities in advancing our shared mission of empowering investor success.

Prior to assuming his current role in 2022, Johnson was the director of global exchange-traded fund and passive strategies research within Morningstar's manager research group. Earlier in his tenure in the manager research organization, he served as the director of ETF research for Europe and Asia. He also previously served as a senior equity analyst, covering the agriculture and chemicals industries. Before joining Morningstar in 2006, he worked as a financial advisor for Morgan Stanley.

Johnson holds a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of Wisconsin. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation. In 2015, Fund Directions and Fund Action named Johnson among the 2015 Rising Stars of Mutual Funds.

Sponsor Center