Our Take on GE's Fourth Quarter
Profit was below expectations, but the firm sees double-digit earnings growth in 2012, according to Morningstar's Daniel Holland.
Profit was below expectations, but the firm sees double-digit earnings growth in 2012, according to Morningstar's Daniel Holland.
General Electric's (GE) fourth-quarter earnings of $0.37 per share were slightly below our estimates for the quarter. The shortfall was largely driven by an additional charge of $0.02 per share related to excess reserves necessary for GE Money's divested Japanese bank. Aside from that, the firm's results were in line with our expectations, and we maintain our fair value estimate at this time.
GE generated $27.1 billion of industrial revenue in the quarter, a 10.6% improvement relative to the prior year with only the consumer business declining. We are encouraged by the strength of energy revenue and orders in the quarter, though the weakness in wind is still having a negative impact on operating margins. The company expects for the wind business to be beneficial starting next year because of customers buying in advance of the expiration of the renewable energy tax credit.
The health-care segment was hit the hardest by the weakness in Europe, with revenue growing 1% but operating profits declining nearly 5% versus the prior year. While the result is disappointing, it was not unexpected given the weaker performance in the third quarter. Given that GE's primary competitors in the market are also struggling, we think GE will be able to hold and potentially improve its market share in the coming quarters.
Operations at GE Capital performed in line with our expectations. The company took a $197 million charge related to the GE Money Japan business sold in 2008. In 2010, the company had several consecutive quarters where it needed to take similar charges for the divested business, but we thought that trend had largely ended once the firm made a final adjustment to the reserve in the third quarter of 2010. Since claims continue to come in at rates higher than management expects, we will likely take a more conservative approach in forecasting GE Capital earnings.
As we expected following the December investor meetings, management has lowered the ending net investment target for GE Capital in 2012 from $440 billion to $425 billion. As management gets a better grasp for what truly is core and what the realistic opportunities for the business are, we think this number will continue to trend down over the coming years. As a consequence, GE Capital's contribution to total corporate earnings should also decline, a change that we welcome.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full GE Analyst Report, including fair value estimate, consider buy/sell prices, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analysis. Not a Premium member? Get these reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.