Bogle: Executive Compensation Has Gotten Totally Out of Hand
The Vanguard founder and former chairman thinks that imperial chief executives are managing firms for their own benefit and not for common shareholders.
The Vanguard founder and former chairman thinks that imperial chief executives are managing firms for their own benefit and not for common shareholders.
Don Phillips: In recent years, you've moved your focus from just the fund industry to much more of capitalism in general, of corporate America. How would you say the state of corporate stewardship is in the US today?
John Bogle: I don't like the state of corporate stewardship in America today. I think the managers of our corporations, their employees, they behave like the imperial chief executives, we call them. They look to their own financial interest. They issue enormous options to themselves. They get the board approval, but they control the boards.
The compensation has gotten totally out of hand, ridiculously out of hand. It's basically robbing the shareholders of these corporations of the money that's really rightfully theirs. That's a system that has to change. Corporations should be managed for the shareholders and not for the managers or the insiders.
<TRANSCRIPT>
Get out the first edition of Intelligent Investor. Forty percent of that book, Benjamin Graham's first edition, 1949, I believe - forty percent of that book is written about what to do when corporations don't operate well or operate too much in favor of insiders. We seem to have forgotten those lessons.
But my view is - and this is the overall master thesis of why I want to develop a federal standard of fiduciary duty for all money managers -- and that is if all money managers acted as fiduciaries, serving only one master, that pension beneficiary or that mutual fund shareholder, then they will demand of corporations that the corporations themselves, they will get back involved in corporate governance. They'll get back involved in long-term investing, and they'll require these corporations, in turn, to apply those same rules of stewardship to their own corporations.
Put the shareholder first. Create value for the shareholder, not in the form of stock price. It's very easy to create a higher stock price with all this financial manipulation, and very difficult, far more difficult, to build the intrinsic value of a company, which ultimately is what America is all about. It's what the stock market is supposed to be giving you in the end, the long run, an investment return and not a speculative return.
So, yes, the corporations have been run in the interest of their management and the mutual fund management companies, are also run in the interest of their managers. They're taking advantage of their agency position.
This is not just my opinion; it's an opinion of Vice Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Supreme Court, so I've got some good support there. The system has to be fixed, and that's the best way I know how to do it: to have money managers return to the days of stewardship and trusteeship.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.