'It feels like he's quietly building a separate life': My husband inherited $500,000, but he refuses to spend it on our home

By Quentin Fottrell

'Our kitchen dates from 1999 and the oven only works if you hit the door a certain way'

"I proposed spending $130,000 ($45,000 for the kitchen, $70,000 for two cars, $15,000 for the trip) and investing the remaining $370,000. He said no." (Photo subjects are models.)

Dear Quentin,

My husband and I have been married for 30 years, with four grown kids. He's planning to retire in 18 months. I've been working part time since 2004, when I cut back to raise the kids and then look after my dad.

My mother-in-law died in April and left him $500,000, mostly from selling her small house in Scranton. She clipped coupons until she was 88, so the money meant a lot to him. I sat with her during her final two weeks, and I don't think he's forgotten that.

I thought we could finally do a few things we've put off. Our kitchen dates from 1999 and the oven only works if you hit the door a certain way. Between them, our cars have a combined 310,000 miles. And I've wanted to see Italy since I was 19.

I proposed spending $130,000 ($45,000 for the kitchen, $70,000 for two cars, $15,000 for the trip) and investing the remaining $370,000. He said no. He wants nearly all of it invested and untouched, "for security," and nothing decided until we meet our adviser in January.

When I said we've shared everything for 30 years, he said: "I'm not saying that's changed. I'm saying this money is mine to decide about." There's another complication: Last year, I gave my sister $25,000 from our joint savings when her divorce was about to cost her the house.

I told him afterward. He was hurt, and he still brings it up every time I mention the inheritance. He says I made a big decision alone and now I'm expecting him to go along with another one. I'll admit that's partly fair. But my sister was in a crisis.

It feels like he's quietly building a separate life with this money after three decades of "ours." I keep wondering if he'd feel the same if the money had come from my family. I don't want to force him to spend a dime he's uncomfortable spending.

Is he entitled to keep it separate just because it came from his mother?

A Wife of 30 Years

Related: 'Fancy cars hold no appeal': We have a 99% chance of outliving our life savings. Why not spend, spend, spend?

You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com. The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

Legally, the $500,000 belongs to your husband, as long as he doesn't commingle the funds in a joint account.

Dear Wife,

You set a precedent.

Legally, the $500,000 belongs to your husband, as long as he doesn't commingle the funds in a joint account. So he can, ethically and morally, invest the money and do whatever he wants with it, even after 30 years of marriage. The money is in his name.

For that reason, I can see why he wants to take his time. You proposed a list of quasi-necessities: a kitchen renovation, which would benefit both of you; two new cars, which may or may not be necessary; and a trip to Italy, which is your dream, not his.

I see how you'd view your 30 years together as giving you nearly 11,000 reasons (the number of days you have been married, give or take a couple of months) to have a say in how he spends or invests the $500,000. It feels all the more galling because you gave up your career.

But the opposite, for better or for worse, is also true: This is the first time in 30 years that he has had money of his own to play around with. He will, I expect or hope, eventually acquiesce to some and/or all of your wishes, but he probably wants the final decision to be his.

The good news is that you are on a solid financial footing. A 4% annual withdrawal rate - the ballpark percentage recommended by advisers - from your $2.1 million retirement portfolio would give you roughly $84,000 per year, or $7,000 per month, before taxes.

Under the 4% rule, you would typically withdraw $84,000 in the first year and increase that amount every subsequent year to account for inflation. The idea is that the withdrawal rate will allow you to weather stock-market corrections, while allowing the remaining funds to grow.

Diplomatically, you didn't really score any points by outlining all the ways you would like to spend his inheritance. I get that you've been married for three decades and raised four children, but this money belonged to his mother, and he also has an emotional attachment to it.

Don't miss: My father has Alzheimer's and his caregiver is using his debit card for DoorDash. Do I intervene?

Don't make him choose

As you say, his mother clipped coupons until she was 88, so spending this money without at least allowing it to rest in his bank account for a respectable period of time might hit him the wrong way. He wants to honor his mother, as much as he wants to be respectful to your wishes.

By forcing the issue, you are - purposefully or not - making him choose. He may feel grief and even perhaps guilt as a result of inheriting a large sum of money from an individual who led a modest lifestyle herself. Investing it might feel right, for now at least.

He may wish to prove a point. You have acted unilaterally and spent $25,000 of your savings to bail your sister out of trouble. He is now exercising that same right. Don't bring up your time spent with his mother; that would risk turning your act of kindness into a transaction.

It's also prudent to not spend the money impulsively, especially on the brink of retirement. What happens if you have a flood that isn't covered by home insurance? Or one of you has an accident? Or one of your children has a financial crisis? These are viable alternatives.

Not everyone wants a spanking new kitchen and is prepared to endure the disruption that such a renovation would cause. He might like it the way it is, or he might not. But I don't necessarily think pushing the issue and keeping the pressure on will lead to a new oven.

Just because you don't have complete control over this money does not mean he is building a "separate life." I urge you not to overreact and jump to conclusions about your husband's long-term plans. Allow him to enjoy his newfound financial independence.

Don't allow your insecurities to overshadow what could be a welcome period of relief after both of you have put in years of hard work. Do you deserve a new kitchen? Sure. Does he deserve to invest this money so it continues to grow? Absolutely. Both things can be true.

Raise a glass to his mother.

Related: My abusive ex-husband promised $20,000 for our kids' education. Now he refuses to pay. Is he legally obligated?

By emailing your questions to The Moneyist or posting your dilemmas on The Moneyist Facebook group, you agree to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch.

More columns from Quentin Fottrell:

My wife cried when I found out she had only $80,000 in her 401(k). I have $2.2 million. Am I wrong to be shocked?

'She's living the dream': My stepmother said I can buy my childhood home for $850,000. Is she taking advantage of me?

My father-in-law, 81, sold his $75,000 home to pay his daughter's $50,000 debt. How can I keep him from becoming destitute?

Check out The Moneyist's private Facebook group, where members help answer life's thorniest money issues. Post your questions, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Co., the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

-Quentin Fottrell

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

11-06-26 0950ET