The cost of Germany's long and painful nuclear regret
By Jules Rimmer
Germany's decision to decommission its nuclear program may have raised electricity prices by 25%
One of Germany's decommissioned nuclear power plants at Gundremmingen in southern Germany. The decision to mothball the plants was taken after the accident at Fukushima in Japan in 2011.
An energy analysis published by JPMorgan has put some numbers on the extent of that error that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has admitted from its decision to shutter nuclear production in wake of the accident at Japan's Fukushima plant in 2011.
The assessment was made by JPMorgan Asset and Wealth Management's chairman of market and investment strategy, Michael Cembalest. In a lengthy report on energy markets, he devoted one chapter to what he labels Germany's "nuclear entscheidungsreue" or "nuclear regret'" He quoted Merz as stating, "So, we're now undertaking the most expensive energy transition in the world; I know of no other country that makes things so expensive and difficult as Germany."
Cembalest highlights research undertaken by JPMorgan that scrutinized the costs incurred to the German economy stemming from its decision to decommission its nuclear power plants after the Fukushima incident. Had it not made this panicky move, Cembalest estimates that Germany would have required 50% less electricity generation from fossil fuels, 84% less generation from imported natural gas, 27% less fossil fuel capacity and 42% less natural gas capacity.
Cembalest estimates electricity prices in 2024 were almost 25% higher than they would have been, were they to have persevered with the nuclear program. As a share of consumption, Germany's electricity imports are double what they were a decade ago.
German energy intensive manufacturing output
The competitive repercussions have been severe: Germany's industrial power prices are now three times higher than those of the U.S. and China. This partly explains, Cembalest writes, the deindustrialization that has afflicted its economy so debilitatingly in the last few years.
Cembalest cites research by Radiant Energy Group that the cost of restarting Class 2 reactors could be $1 billion to $ 3 billion each. It's feasible, they say, but it's not cheap.
German electricity imports and exports
-Jules Rimmer
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
03-09-26 0708ET
Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.The articles, information, and content displayed on this webpage may include materials prepared and provided by third parties. Such third-party content is offered for informational purposes only and is not endorsed, reviewed, or verified by Morningstar.
Morningstar makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any third-party content displayed on this site. The views and opinions expressed in third-party content are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Morningstar, its affiliates, or employees.
Morningstar is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or delays in this content, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Users are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent financial advice before making any decisions based on such content. The third-party providers of this content are not affiliated with Morningstar, and their inclusion on this site does not imply any form of partnership, agency, or endorsement.
Popular
3 Stocks to Sell and 3 Stocks to Buy for October
The 10 Best Companies to Invest in Now
14 Elite Funds and ETFs, and 5 Popular Funds That Just Missed the Mark
3 Stocks to Invest In With More Room to Run
