America is aging into a caregiving desert. Nobody is ready.

By Neal K. Shah

The U.S. desperately needs to evolve its caregiving system, as adults who end up caring for their aging parents and family members are struggling. What happens next?

By 2050, Americans will enter their senior years with even fewer caregivers, fewer children and fewer resources. The care desert will worsen - unless we build something different now.

It's 11:47 p.m., and Sarah is changing her father's bedsheets for the second time in one night. The home health aide cancelled - again. Her father, who practiced law for 40 years, now can't even remember her name. A Zoom call with colleagues in Tokyo starts at 6 a.m., but she has to keep working. The cost of keeping him home with round-the-clock care is $24,000 a month. Do the math.

Millions of Americans now live in this silent and exhausting emergency.

What's coming next won't be so quiet.

For the first time in history, there will be more Americans who are older than 65 years old than younger than 18. The fertility rate in the U.S. has dropped from 3.5 children per woman in 1962 to 1.6 children per woman in 2023, the lowest in recorded history. We're not approaching a "demographic shift." We're in free fall.

Our entire economic and policy infrastructure was built for an earlier time when families were large, longevity was shorter and caregiving was distributed across siblings, neighbors and extended networks that no longer exist.

In 2025, every metric that matters for caregiving is flashing red:

-- The U.S. is expected to need 1.2 million more direct-care workers by 2030.

-- There are more than 700,000 people on waitlists for Medicaid home- and community-based services, with some states posting decade-long waits.

-- America already relies on 63 million unpaid family caregivers, per AARP.

-- The cost of 24/7 care could cost up to $300,000 a year, based on data from the Genworth Cost of Care Survey.

-- Medicare doesn't cover long-term custodial care.

America's caregiving system is a multivariable failure that will have serious economic repercussions.

Society is oblivious to the reality of its current demographics

While our population pyramid is inverting, people who reach age 65 are now expected to live for at least another 20 years. Here's how that translates: Between you and your spouse, that's potentially four aging parents to care for. There are fewer siblings to share the load, and help will be needed for the extra decade that your parents live.

U.S. politicians rarely say this out loud, but the current eldercare system was built on the assumption that unpaid daughters and sons would be endlessly available.

They won't be. The math doesn't add up.

I've seen this collision firsthand. Until my mid-30s, I worked in finance, running hedge funds and optimizing business models with spreadsheets. But my direct experiences with caregiving - first for my grandfather with dementia, then for my wife through cancer - taught me how broken our society's care infrastructure is. It catalyzed a shift in my life's work, and a decision to dedicate the rest of my career to improving it.

The caregiving burden

We are burning out the very people holding the care system together. Women caregivers lose an average of $324,000 in lifetime income and Social Security benefits. Family caregivers for people with dementia now provide 31 hours per week of unpaid care. This isn't a "work-life balance" issue, but what would be better called "labor-force extraction."

One in 5 adults in the U.S. provides care for an aging or disabled loved one. Millions are "sandwich generation" caregivers, balancing young children and aging parents. They spend an average of 22-plus hours per week on eldercare. They're performing nursing-level medical tasks like wound care and medication management without compensation or training. Only 11% receive any medical instruction.

The market is already responding in brutal ways. Home-care agencies turn away clients due to staffing shortages. The price of assisted living is rising faster than inflation. And some families are draining their retirement accounts to keep parents safe at home.

This is what a care desert looks like.

The workforce crisis no one in Washington wants to talk about

Immigration policies have quietly worsened the shortage. Nearly 28% of the direct-care workforce is foreign-born. An estimated 365,000 healthcare workers are undocumented and potentially face a heightened risk of deportation after the rollback of "sensitive locations" protections.

Countries like Canada and Japan are facing similar demographic shifts but have introduced care-specific visa pathways and national caregiver pipelines, as detailed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The U.S. has no equivalent strategy.

Our federal caregiving policy is still, more or less: "Good luck, daughters (and sons)."

We talk about societal "infrastructure" when bridges fail, but not when families do. But our caregiving system's failure is just as shocking as any engineering collapse. The American caregiving system is failing because it was never designed for a society of aging singles, widowed elders, adult children living states away and a shrinking labor pool.

Today, 1 in 3 older adults live alone. The median American lives 30 miles away from their nearest family member. The country has changed, but our care infrastructure hasn't.

Caregiving should be America's next great infrastructure project

The path forward is very clear, if we choose to embrace it:

-- Treat caregiving like essential infrastructure. Federal investment should reflect its economic impact. AARP estimates the value of unpaid care at $600 billion per year.

-- Create a national caregiving workforce pipeline through high-school programs, community-college credentials, prehealth training and care-specific visas.

-- Fund home-based care support for older adults. It will relieve the strain on family caregivers.

-- Support family caregivers with Social Security credits, stipends and portable benefits.

-- Build technology that augments human care, such as AI for caregiver training, coordination and navigation. The Department of Health and Human Services just announced a large and promising innovation contest for building AI for caregivers. (My company, CareYaya, plans to enter it.)

This is why I founded my company: to expand the care workforce by connecting tens of thousands of healthcare students with older adults who need companionship and support. It's one small dent in a massive problem, but proof of what's possible when we focus on care as essential infrastructure.

The eldercare collapse doesn't have to be inevitable

Every day, I meet families caught between demographic forces they never created, and policies that pretend none of this is happening. They're not angry. They're simply tired - too tired to demand the structural change that is required.

The demographic reality doesn't care about congressional calendars or partisan politics. By 2050, Americans will enter their senior years with even fewer caregivers, fewer children and fewer resources. The care desert will worsen, unless we build something different now.

Throughout our history, America has rebuilt - after recessions, wars and pandemics. We can rebuild caregiving, too. But first we have to take responsibility and acknowledge that caregiving is not just a "personal matter," but a failure of national infrastructure. The longer we pretend families can shoulder it alone, the more costly the collapse will be.

Neal K. Shah is a healthcare researcher specializing in caregiving and artificial intelligence. He is the principal investigator of the Johns Hopkins YayaGuide AI Innovation project and co-principal investigator of the University of Pennsylvania's CounterforceAI project. Shah also serves on North Carolina's Steering Committee on Aging. He is CEO of CareYaya, chair of Counterforce Health and the author of "Insured to Death: How Health Insurance Screws Over Americans - And How We Take It Back."

-Neal K. Shah

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

11-27-25 1726ET