Meta Gets EU Antitrust Order to Open WhatsApp to Rival AI Chatbots — Update
By Edith Hancock
The European Union told Meta Platforms to reverse a policy that effectively bans rival artificial intelligence chatbots from using a tool to communicate with users on WhatsApp as officials continue to probe the company's messaging service.
The order marks the latest step from the European Commission--the EU's executive arm--in its competition probe into Meta's AI practices after the company updated its WhatsApp business terms last year.
Officials started investigating the company in December over what they called concerns that the changes unfairly squeezed out competitors. The policy stopped generative AI companies from accessing the company's WhatsApp for Business Application Programming Interface--or API--while still letting Meta's own AI services use it. The API tool allows companies to use WhatsApp to do things like send order notifications.
The commission can impose so-called interim measures--essentially an injunction--on companies while investigations are progressing to prevent what officials see as further harm to a particular market.
A spokesperson for Meta said the company would appeal the decision, calling it regulatory overreach that boiled down to the commission allowing some of the world's largest companies to use the paid WhatsApp Business product for free.
Meta first offered to let competing AI assistants use its WhatsApp business software for a fee in March this year in a bid to appease the commission, and then offered access free of charge for one month in May. The commission said that the fee offer is equivalent to the previous access ban.
"In rapidly evolving markets, competition can be lost long before a final decision is adopted. This is why these interim measures will remain in place for the duration of the investigation, in order to prevent harm that would be almost impossible to repair," Teresa Ribera, the EU's competition chief, said in a statement on Tuesday. She also said to reporters in Brussels that the fee Meta had proposed in its first offer was too high.
Write to Edith Hancock at edith.hancock@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 09, 2026 12:59 ET (16:59 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.The articles, information, and content displayed on this webpage may include materials prepared and provided by third parties. Such third-party content is offered for informational purposes only and is not endorsed, reviewed, or verified by Morningstar.
Morningstar makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any third-party content displayed on this site. The views and opinions expressed in third-party content are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Morningstar, its affiliates, or employees.
Morningstar is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or delays in this content, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Users are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent financial advice before making any decisions based on such content. The third-party providers of this content are not affiliated with Morningstar, and their inclusion on this site does not imply any form of partnership, agency, or endorsement.
Popular
3 Stocks to Sell and 3 Stocks to Buy in August
These 15 Stocks Destroyed the Most Shareholder Value Over the Past Decade
10 Best Growth Stocks to Buy for the Long Term
2 Undervalued Stocks That Just Raised Dividends
