JPMorgan Developed International Val Fd earns a High Process Pillar rating.
The largest contributor to the rating is the fund's strong long-term risk-adjusted performance. This can be seen in its five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 57% also bolsters the process. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and beat their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their relatively high success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. The parent firm's excellent risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, influences the rating as well.
This strategy tends to hold smaller, deeper value companies than its average peer in the Foreign Large Value Morningstar Category. Analyzing additional factors, this strategy has consistently favored low-quality stocks compared with Morningstar Category peers over the past few years. Such positions do not tend to provide much ballast for a portfolio. In the latest month, the strategy was also less exposed to the Quality factor compared with Morningstar Category peers. This strategy also has had an overweight bias to the volatility factor over these years, meaning it has owned companies that have a higher historical standard deviation of returns. This is a higher-risk, higher-reward approach. Compared with category peers, the strategy also had more exposure to the Volatility factor in the most recent month. In addition, this strategy's holdings have included more companies with high dividend or buyback yields than peers over these years. High-yield stocks tend to be connected to more mature companies earning enough cash to return some to shareholders. At times, however, extreme market pressure can force them to cut their dividends, which hurts stock performance. In this month, the strategy also had more exposure to the Yield factor over its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in financial services and energy relative to the category average by 10.3 and 2.9 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and consumer defensive, underweight the average by 6.7 and 5.6 percentage points of assets, respectively. The portfolio is positioned across 232 holdings and is relatively top-heavy. Of the strategy's assets, 18.1% are concentrated within the top 10 holdings, compared to the category’s 13.9% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, on a year-over-year basis, 34% of the fund's holdings have turned over, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position.