Marty Whitman Takes On Warren Buffett
Third Avenue opposes Clayton Homes acquisition.
Third Avenue opposes Clayton Homes acquisition.
When Warren Buffett buys out one of a fund manager's holdings, it's a bittersweet moment. On the one hand, the manager is happy that the world's greatest investor has placed his stamp of approval on the investment.
On the other, he or she usually hates the price Buffett is paying. After all, Buffett didn't get where he is by overpaying for companies. Buy-and-hold investors might have spent weeks researching a firm before buying. Therefore, they're expecting a big reward on that investment of time and money when the market recognizes a company's value. However, Buffett typically pays only a small premium on a company's share price. Of course, the fund managers who own Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) are usually happy about this. So, it's not uncommon for managers to be on both sides of a Berkshire deal.
Still, those who are getting their shares bought out will often just accept their fate because Buffett is usually holding all the cards, and they aren't interested in tangling with a rightly revered investor.
Marty Whitman enjoys a good fight, however, and he's leading an effort to get Clayton Homes shareholders to reject Berkshire's takeover offer. The acquisition is priced at $12.50 a share--just a 13% premium to where the shares were trading when the offer was made.
Third Avenue Real Estate Value (TAREX) manager Michael Winer argues that Clayton Homes was improperly valued because the analysis was done on the trailing 12 months, which represented a cyclical trough for the manufactured-home maker.
"Just as it would be inappropriate to value a business based on one year's operating results at the peak of a cycle, I believe it is inappropriate to value Clayton Homes based on one year's operating results at what appears to be the trough of the cycle," Winer said.
Winer is going to have to be persuasive because his fund holds only 0.2% of Clayton Homes shares. A couple of other investors have joined in the opposition to the deal, too. The shareholder vote is set for July 16, so stay tuned.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.