Fed Errs on the High Side
The Federal Reserve has historically been too optimistic with its monetary-policy projections.
The Federal Reserve has historically been too optimistic with its monetary-policy projections.
Roland Czerniawski: The Federal Reserve has historically overestimated the future fed-funds rate in their forecasts. In this week's chart, we look at historical FOMC fed-funds rate projections. The green line represents the actual effective fed-funds rate, while the other various colored lines represent the Fed's projections for a particular year at any given point in time.
For example, in 2012, the Fed forecast that the fed-funds rate would be around 1% by the end of 2014. Starting in 2013, they began adjusting that forecast down to just 25 basis points. A similar pattern can be noticed in projections for 2015, 2016, and 2017, when the Fed was consistently raising their fed-funds rate forecasts until late 2014. According to those earlier forecasts in 2014, the Fed thought that rates would be well above 1% by the end of this year, which we now know was a long overshot.
Starting in 2015, the Fed governors began to readjust their forecasts down. According to the more recent projections from the September FOMC meeting, the governors now see the fed-funds rate at 3% by the end of 2017 and somewhere near 3.75% in the long run.
Given recent developments and further delays in the timing of the Fed's liftoff, it's likely that the fed-funds rate forecasts for future years will be adjusted down even further. This suggests that the Fed has historically been too optimistic with their monetary-policy projections; not until last year did the Fed governors finally accept the slower 2.0% to 2.5% economic growth as the new reality.
Investors should be aware that the actual fed-funds rate typically differs widely from the Fed's projections, suggesting that the path of rate normalization is highly uncertain.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.