These Topnotch Offerings Are Betting on Europe
These funds have proved their contrarian stripes.
These funds have proved their contrarian stripes.
The global financial markets are fixated on the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. And though it's unclear as to how the crisis will play out, there doesn't seem to be an end in sight given massive deficits, unemployment, the threat of credit downgrades, and political turmoil. Thus, investing in Europe has become a decidedly contrarian move.
But is it a complete doom-and-gloom scenario for the eurozone, or are some fund managers finding fertile ground to unearth buying opportunities amid the growing pessimism?
To seek out funds that were boldly treading into the beleaguered European market, we used the Premium Fund Screener to search for noninstitutional funds within the world-stock category and foreign small-, mid-, and large-cap universes with more than 70% of their assets in Europe. (We set that baseline by looking to the MSCI EAFE Index, which has a 66.08% stake in Europe).
We then eliminated load funds and those with fees that exceed their category averages, and layered on a screen for managers who have helmed the fund for at least five years. Finally, we sought offerings that emphasize downside protection by requiring funds with Morningstar Risk ratings of below average or better. Below, we highlight two of screener's funds. Premium users can click here to replicate this screen.
Tweedy, Browne Global Value (TBGVX)
Currently, this portfolio has a 71% stake in Europe compared with the US Foreign Large Value category average of 62%. But the seasoned managers pay attention to the downside: Management prefers high-quality companies and likes to buy them when they're trading cheaply relative to what they think they're worth. The fund's returns will often be out of sync with its peers, in part because of its quality emphasis, distinct sector biases, and the fact that management hedges most of the fund's currency exposure back into the dollar. That said, investors seeking lower-risk foreign exposure with a distinctly contrarian flair will find a fine core holding in this offering.
USAA International (USIFX)
Skippers Marcus Smith and Daniel Ling are valuation-conscious growth managers, so they're invariably lightening up on popular areas and buying out-of-favor names. Case in point: Their exposure to greater Europe is at 71% currently, versus 59% for the average U.S. foreign large growth fund. Smith and Ling maintain a long-term perspective--turnover here is much lower than that of the fund's typical peer. Such a reserved approach makes this fund most appropriate for moderate investors rather than those seeking a highflying growth fund.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.