Bogle: The Standard Bond Index Suits Me Fine
The Vanguard founder says he's dubious that value-weighted bond indexing can consistently beat the market.
The Vanguard founder says he's dubious that value-weighted bond indexing can consistently beat the market.
Christine Benz: There's recently been some conversation about fixed-income indexing and whether by indexing the fixed-income market, you are taking ever larger shares and the most profligate borrowers, and is that something you want to do? I would like to hear your response to that concern.
John Bogle: Well, I don't happen to be very much of an expert of that. I have been very happy with standard bond indexing, which is cap-weighted: If a bond has a lot of value, a lot of maturity value, a lot of face value, principal value, then it has a bigger position in the fund. I don't see anything the matter with that. I want to be very clear on this – it's not as if the borrowers are more profligate; a giant company is going to have more debt than a teeny company, and I would say that there is at least a 50- 50 chance a little teeny company with a tiny amount of debt is going to do worse than the giant company. They are probably not going to be as stable and things like that.
So I'm a tried-and-true market-cap-weighted indexer, whether you're talking stocks or whether you're talking bonds. I'm always dubious when someone says, here's a way that will enable you to beat the market--whether it would be the bond market or stock market--forever. There is no way to beat the bond market and stock market forever.
I mean the reality is, as I've said to Rob Arnott, the problem is, Rob, that if you're right, you're wrong, and that is if he is right, that value-weighted indexing in either case is a certain winner in the future, then everybody will put their money into it, and then they won't be a certain winner in the time that follows.
So there is a lot of self-correcting, reversion of the mean, if you will, in the system, and I wouldn't say it's beyond the realm of possibility that his strategies could produce an extra half a point of return or an extra point of return over a long period of time, but there is an equal possibility they'll produce less. They are actually not that different from the regular, cap-weighted indexes. So I'm satisfied with the returns from the index, and I don't think we should be doing much to enhance it.
And that's not to say I am not worried about debt. I am worried about U.S. Treasury debt. And, of course, that worry is much broader, because worrying about U.S. Treasury debt is worrying about the U.S., and we have a whole lot of problems in this country that are very intractable and very discouraging. We see our political system that seems to be stalemated, a political system at this point, momentarily before the election, if I see one more political ad, I think I am going to throw my television set out the window. I mean they are all disgusting on both sides, appealing to our basest instincts and not appealing to our good citizenship. So I worry about that, too.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.