ETF Investors Buy in May
Emerging-markets ETFs lead another month of net inflows for the industry.
Emerging-markets ETFs lead another month of net inflows for the industry.
ETF investors seemingly ignored the old stock market adage: "Sell in May and go away." In fact, the ETF industry posted its best month of the year, in terms of net inflows, attracting more than $14 billion in new assets during the month. For some context, this compares with May 2008 net ETF inflows of about $3.3 billion. Leveraged and inverse ETFs accounted for about 11% of the month's net inflows, versus 27% last month. The impressive inflows of the past month helped push the industry's year-to-date total net inflows to more than $20.5 billion. With the markets showing resiliency in holding on to gains from its recent rally, we're seeing investors start to regain their appetites for risk. A sign that optimism about the economy is growing can be seen in the bond markets; the yield on the 10-year Treasury note is now at its highest level since November, rising almost a complete percentage point since the end of April.
Emerging markets continued to shine in May. As seen in the table below, five emerging-markets ETFs-- iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (EEM), iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (FXI), iShares MSCI Brazil (EWZ), Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock ETF (VWO), and iShares MSCI Taiwan (EWT)--made the top 10 and, combined, accounted for about $5 billion in total net inflows for the month (about 35% of total industry flows). These developing economies have certainly led the global stock market rally over the past several weeks (check out the year-to-date performances in the far right-hand column of the table). However, those considering allocating fresh capital to the group might wish to exercise some patience here. Emerging markets were slammed the hardest in 2008, but jumping in here after the group has rallied so much in such a short time span almost smacks of performance-chasing.
IShares Barclays TIPS Bond (TIP) has been another familiar face on the top ETF inflows list over the past several months and has now reached more than $13 billion in assets. The screaming bargain we highlighted in TIPS at the end of last year is steadily disappearing. The break-even rate implied by 10-year indexed government bonds is now close to its 10-year average, now sitting at about 1.6%. While not as attractive as when the break-even rate was implying less than 1% inflation over the next 10 years, we still like TIPS relative to traditional U.S. Treasuries.
Top ETF Inflows in May 2009 | |||
Estimated Net Inflow ($MIL) | AUM ($Mil) | YTD % Change | |
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EEM) | 1,142 | 30,793 | 38 |
iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (FXI) | 1,123 | 9,295 | 34 |
iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ) | 1,065 | 8,417 | 68 |
United States Natural Gas (UNG) | 929 | 2,187 | -33 |
iShares Barclays TIPS Bond (TIP) | 865 | 13,185 | 6 |
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock ETF (VWO) | 800 | 8,801 | 41 |
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) | 791 | 1,529 | -87 |
iShares MSCI Taiwan Index (EWT) | 746 | 2,795 | 49 |
UltraShort S&P500 ProShares (SDS) | 669 | 3,860 | -25 |
iShares Russell 2000 Index (IWM) | 505 | 9,234 | 6 |
As shown in the table below, United States Oil (USO) topped the list of largest redemptions in May. With the price per barrel of crude oil approximately doubling over the past couple of months, this might have some observers scratching their heads. If we had to guess, though, we'd say that the investors who piled into the fund during the first quarter in hopes of playing the rebound in oil were sorely disappointed to learn that dealing with the negative monthly roll yield in the futures markets can wreak havoc on their expected returns. Because of the persistence of contango in the oil futures markets, USO has posted a year-to-date return of about 9% while the price of oil has soared nearly 100% from its lows. For more on this often-misunderstood market dynamic, check out my colleague Paul Justice's recent video report, "What's the Best Way to Invest in Oil?"
Not surprisingly, Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF) was also near the top of the list for net redemptions. Keep in mind that although the year-to-date performance of XLF is about flat, it's the financials sector that has led the S&P 500's impressive rally off of its March 9 lows. XLF has risen almost 100% since bottoming in March, with Materials Select Sector SPDR (XLB), Industrial Select Sector SPDR (XLI), and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY) next in line with gains ranging from 40% to 50% over the same period. Selling the financials at this juncture strikes us as prudent profit-taking considering the tough regulatory environment and uncertain economic backdrop.
Top ETF Outflows in May 2009 | |||
Estimated Net Outflow ($MIL) | AUM ($Mil) | YTD % Change | |
United States Oil (USO) | -911 | 2,799 | 9 |
MidCap SPDRs (MDY) | -589 | 6,532 | 12 |
Financial Select Sector SPDR (XLF) | -531 | 5,245 | -2 |
Ultra S&P500 ProShares (SSO) | -505 | 2,406 | 5 |
PowerShares QQQ | -441 | 13,357 | 23 |
iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate (IYR) | -395 | 1,401 | -5 |
SPDRs (SPY) | -366 | 63,692 | 6 |
iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond (SHY) | -342 | 7,059 | 0 |
iShares Russell Midcap Index (IWR) | -330 | 3,612 | 14 |
Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) | -327 | 4,492 | 12 |
While the industry's net asset inflows might appear muted in comparison to the huge inflows that we saw in the fourth quarter of 2008 amid the height of the crisis, the ETF industry is still well ahead of last year in terms of asset gathering. ETFs attracted approximately $176 billion in net inflows last year, but through the end of May 2008 total inflows were just $10 billion--about half of where we stand today. Although we're off to a decent start, it's far too early to start drawing conclusions about the ETF industry for the full year. Still, it seems apparent that investors and financial advisors alike continue to be drawn to the transparency, low costs, and tax efficiency that passive ETF strategies afford them.
ETFInvestor Newsletter | ||||
Let our new newsletter, Morningstar ETFInvestor, help you navigate the exciting and new world of exchange-traded funds. Each issue includes recommendations for commonsense ETF investing, | ETF spotlights, and critical data on 350 top ETFs. This one-year subscription consists of 12 monthly issues. Learn more. | |||
$159.00 for 12 Print Issues | $139 for 12 PDF Issues | |||
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.