FOMC Throws a Wrench in the "Short Treasuries" Trade
Reviewing the dangerous "short Treasuries" trade.
Reviewing the dangerous "short Treasuries" trade.
Yesterday's press release from the Federal Open Market Committee caught some market participants by surprise with the committee's decision to increase the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet by another 50% to more than $3 trillion.
Over the past several months we've heard repeatedly from the various regulators and authorities in Washington that they'll be using all the tools at their disposal to deal with the current crisis. Today's FOMC statements support those claims. Catching many off guard, the committee announced that it has decided to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasuries over the next six months. According to the release, these purchases are aimed at "improving conditions in private credit markets." However, we could also speculate that the Fed's aim is to keep Treasury yields near historic lows in anticipation of the massive slug of Treasuries it will need to issue later this year to finance its various stimulus and recovery programs. We're not suggesting that this is in fact the Fed's motive; rather our aim is to foster debate and discussion. In any case, the Fed's purchase of Treasuries is an unprecedented move that shows that Bernanke and company are willing to do whatever it takes to revive the economy.
Back in December, we floated the idea of taking a short-position in U.S. Treasuries when the 10-year bond was trading with a yield of about 2.65%. (See "Are Treasuries in a Bubble?") We never pulled the trigger however, as prices didn't quite reach levels (below 2%) that we were comfortable with in order to make the trade. To make a long story short, we think it is very difficult to build solid conviction in such a trade, considering the event risks that abound. Yesterday's announcement from the Fed is exactly the sort of thing that can turn a well-reasoned investment thesis on its head.
The new reality for investors, at least in the near to midterm, is that government intervention and involvement cannot be ruled out (or relied upon). For the investor who did bet against a fall in longer-dated Treasuries via UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury ProShares (TBT), the announcement might have been a bit of a disappointment. In response to the news, TBT dropped nearly 10% for the day. Also, the yield on 10-year Treasuries plunged almost 16%, to 2.53%. (It opened on March 18 with a yield of more than 3%). This begs the question: How confident can we really be when we're playing in a game with constantly changing rules?
We continue to believe that there is in fact a bubble building in the U.S. Treasuries market. However, we lack the conviction to act due to our belief that events beyond our control (i.e. more government action) could strongly influence our investment's performance. Without question, the policies coming out of the Fed have long-term inflationary implications. We could also argue that the U.S. dollar could lose its status as the reserve currency down the road (or at least weaken considerably) as a result of the mess we're currently in or that investors will jump back into risk assets (thereby driving the yields on Treasuries higher). While these three factors support our thesis that Treasuries look frothy, there is still too much uncertainty around potential policy decisions and the timing of those decisions for our taste.
Of course, we could be wrong. Intrepid investors shouldn't be deterred altogether by our cautious stance--every investor's situation is different. Surely there is plenty of "smart money" out there looking to short Treasuries. Warren Buffett, the famed CEO of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), even stated in his most recent shareholder letter (on Page 16) that, "When the financial history of this decade is written, it will surely speak of the Internet bubble of the late 1990s and the housing bubble of the early 2000s. But the U.S. Treasury bond bubble of late 2008 may be regarded as almost equally extraordinary."
Other ETFs--besides the TBT--that offer exposure to long-dated Treasury securities and could be impacted by today's developments include iShares Barclays 10-20 Year Treasury Bond (TLH), iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond (TLT), and SPDR Barclays Capital Long Term Treasury (TLO).
ETFInvestor Newsletter | ||||
Let our new newsletter, Morningstar ETFInvestor, help you navigate the exciting and new world of exchange-traded funds. Each issue includes recommendations for commonsense ETF investing, | ETF spotlights, and critical data on 350 top ETFs. This one-year subscription consists of 12 monthly issues. Learn more. | |||
$159.00 for 12 Print Issues | $139 for 12 PDF Issues | |||
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.