State Gives 529 Investors a Bad Deal
Won't someone think of the children?
Won't someone think of the children?
Not too long ago, the state of Illinois made room for brokers under its 529 umbrella by providing options that carry a commission. I like the idea of having both no-load and load options in 529 plans.
So, let’s see: Illinois has made room for high-powered banks (Citigroup (C)), elected officials (the state collects fees on 529s), and brokers. I guess that covers everyone. Oh wait, Illinois forgot about the children (and their parents) who hope to pay for college one day with their 529 savings.
In searching for a firm to run its 529 plan, Illinois passed up firms with low costs and great performance, such as Vanguard, American, and T. Rowe Price, in favor of Citigroup and its lineup of bland funds. Maybe Illinois’ elected officials felt that C students in the state would be intimidated by all that accomplishment, so it opted for a mediocre underachiever.
At this point, what Illinois did would be disappointing but no worse than a bunch of states. But Illinois must have known that its 529 plan couldn’t compete with the likes of Utah and Virginia, which had lower costs and better shops (Vanguard and American, respectively). So, Illinois walled off access to all other states’ 529 plans by denying tax breaks to anyone choosing another state’s plan. It even went so far as to tax Illinois residents on withdrawals from 529 plans offered by other states.
This kind of reminds me of the way banana republics behave when they decide their local industries can’t compete with the rest of the world--they erect big trade barriers to protect them. Of course, it may hurt consumers and other businesses in those countries, but it does protect the local champions' turf.
When senior analyst Dan McNeela named the five worst 529 plans in the February issue of Morningstar FundInvestor, he didn’t put Illinois on the list. The reason is that Dan was looking at just the plans rather than the legislation that enacted them. However, if you step back and look at the overall deal being offered to state residents, Illinoisans are probably worse off than anyone else. On the one hand Illinois created a tax break, but with the other it made sure that most of the benefits would be shared by the state and the finance industry.
After Dan’s list came out, the state of Ohio improved its offering by adding some good funds to its lineup. That leaves an opening in our five worst list. Illinois, your table is waiting….
You can find info on 529 plans here.
Poll Results
In my last poll, I asked which shop’s inflows were getting out of hand. American got the most votes, but opinion was divided.
25.6% - American Funds
11.1% - Dodge & Cox
14.6% - Fidelity
1.7% - T. Rowe Price
14.9% - Vanguard
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals
and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through
license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates
asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management.
We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences
and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.