JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating.
The main driver of the rating is the parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 56%. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and outperformed their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. The parent firm's impressive risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, also contributes to the process. Lastly, the process is limited by being an actively managed strategy. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that actively managed funds have generally underperformed their passive counterparts, especially over longer time horizons.
This strategy is similar to its Small Growth category peers in terms of market-cap and style exposure. Analyzing additional factors, the fund has held stocks with higher trading volumes compared to Morningstar Category Peers in the past few years. More-liquid assets contribute to more-flexible exit strategies without price changes and tend to be a ballast during market selloffs. For example, if the portfolio faces successive redemptions in a short period of time, it will be less likely to experience a significant loss. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Liquidity factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. The strategy has also had a defensive tilt, demonstrated by lower exposure to the quality factor than peers in recent years. This means the fund has avoided holding companies that are consistently profitable, growing, and have solid balance sheets. Lacking this ballast, the fund's prospects could rest on its ability to surpass peers during economic booms. Similarly, in recent months, the strategy also had less exposure to the Quality factor than peers. Additionally, the managers have consistently taken on more risk, demonstrated by higher volatility exposure than peers. This orientation tends to pay off most prominently when markets are hot. In this month, the strategy also had more exposure to the Volatility factor over its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in technology and consumer cyclical relative to the category average by 4.6 and 3.1 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are financial services and industrials, with financial services underweighting the average portfolio by 5.5 percentage points of assets and industrials similar to the average. The portfolio is positioned across 134 holdings and its assets are more dispersed than peers in the category. In particular, 17.6% of the portfolio's assets are concentrated in the top 10 fund holdings, compared to the typical peer's 26.3%. And in closing, in terms of portfolio turnover, looking at year-over-year movements, 33% of the fund's holdings have turned over, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position.