JPMorgan Developed International Value A JFEAX

The strategy charges fees in line with its similarly distributed peers, priced within the middle quintile.

The strategy's sensible investment philosophy merits a High Process Pillar rating. Independent of the rating, analysis of the strategy's portfolio shows it has maintained a significant underweight position in quality exposure and an overweight in volatility exposure compared with category peers. Low quality exposure is attributed to stocks with higher financial leverage and lower profitability. And high volatility exposure is rooted in stocks that have a higher standard deviation of returns. The management team's large personal investment in the strategy helps it earn an Above Average People Pillar rating. The strategy's parent organization earns the firm an Above Average Parent Pillar rating, and this rating is inherited from vehicles belonging to the same branding entity and is indirectly assigned by an analyst.

JPMorgan Developed International Val Fd earns a High Process Pillar rating.

The predominant contributor to the rating is the fund's impressive long-term risk-adjusted performance. This can be seen in its five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 56% also contributes to the process. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and beat their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their respectable success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. The parent firm's excellent risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, influences the rating as well.

This strategy tends to hold smaller, deeper value companies compared with its average peer in the Foreign Large Value Morningstar Category. Looking at additional factor exposure, this strategy has consistently favored low-quality stocks compared with Morningstar Category peers over the past few years. Lacking this ballast, the fund's prospects could rest on its ability to beat peers during economic booms. In the latest month, the strategy was also less exposed to the Quality factor compared with Morningstar Category peers. This strategy also has had an overweight bias to the volatility factor over these years, meaning it has owned companies that have a higher historical standard deviation of returns. Such stocks tend to rise faster and fall harder than the broad market. High-volatility exposure contributes to stronger performance during bull markets, but often at the cost of losing more during downturns. Compared with category peers, the strategy also had more exposure to the Volatility factor in the most recent month. In addition, this strategy's holdings have included more companies with high dividend or buyback yields than peers over these years. Stocks with high yields can be more stable, mature companies, but at times extreme market pressure or fundamental deterioration may prompt them to cut their dividends, which tends to hurt stock performance. In this month, the strategy also had more exposure to the Yield factor over its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.

The portfolio is overweight in financial services by 10.8 percentage points in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its energy allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are technology and consumer defensive, underweight the average by 6.6 and 5.8 percentage points of assets, respectively. The portfolio is composed of 242 holdings and is relatively top-heavy. Of the strategy's assets, 17.0% are concentrated within the top 10 holdings, as opposed to the typical peer's 14.4%. And in closing, in terms of portfolio turnover, looking at year-over-year movements, 34% of the fund's holdings have changed, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position.

The most important driver of the rating is its parent firm's five-year success ratio of 56%. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and beat their respective category's median return for the period. The combined average five-year excess return of each manager also influences the rating. It implies that the funds they manage have beat the average manager.

Michael Barakos, the longest-tenured manager on the strategy, provides strong guidance, offering over 25 years of listed portfolio management experience. The average Morningstar Rating of the strategies they manage is 3.4 stars, demonstrating above-average risk-adjusted performance. The team boasts an experienced corps of listed portfolio managers, with three others supporting Michael Barakos. Together, they average 17 years of listed portfolio management experience. The team has successfully retained portfolio-manager talent, providing continuity for strategies as long-term stability tends to support positive results. There have been no documented departures within the past five years.

As of 2022, this investment stalwart manages more than USD 2.5 trillion in AUM. Composed of various global cohorts and diverse asset classes, the firm has more tightly integrated its capabilities in recent years, notably through the development of proprietary analytical and risk systems. Investment teams are robustly staffed and helmed by seasoned contributors. The firm’s strategies tend to produce reliable portfolios, and several flagship offerings are Morningstar Medalists. Manager incentives align with fundholders'; compensation reflects longer-term performance factors, and portfolio managers invest in the firm’s strategies as part of their compensation plans.

The firm’s funds tend to be well-priced, but they aren’t as competitive as many highly regarded peers of similar scale. Recent product launches include thematic and single-country strategies, both of which carry the potential for volatile performance and flows, along with misuse by investors. The firm remains intrepid when it comes to developing an environmental, social, and governance-focused framework and continues to move into other areas such as direct indexing through its 55iP acquisition and China through its joint venture, but these complicated initiatives take time to assess any real and lasting effect.

It has provided mixed returns compared with peers, but similar returns compared with the category benchmark. Over an eight-year period, this share class' outperformed the category’s average by an annualized 29 basis points. But when expanded to a 10-year period, it underperformed the average by 31 basis points. However, it mirrored the return of the category index, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Value Index, over the 10-year period. Although the overall rating does not hinge on one-year performance figures, it is notable that this share class returned 20.8%, an impressive 7.0-percentage-point lead over its average peer, placing it within the top 10% of its category.

When adjusting for risk, this fund is competitive. The share class led the index with a higher Sharpe ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted return, over the trailing 10-year period. Often, higher returns are associated with more risk. However, this strategy hewed close to the benchmark's standard deviation. However, the share class proved itself ineffective as it was unable to generate alpha, over the same 10-year period, against the category group index: a benchmark that encapsulates the performance of the broader asset class.

This share class lands in the middle quintile of its Morningstar Category. Its modest expense ratio, in conjunction with the fund’s People, Process, and Parent Pillars, indicates that this share class has the ability to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark, leading to its Morningstar Medalist Rating of Silver.