Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating.
The most important driver of the rating is the fund's strong long-term risk-adjusted performance. This can be seen in its five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk. The parent firm's five-year risk-adjusted success ratio of 56% also influences the rating. The measure indicates the percentage of a firm's funds that survived and outperformed their respective category's median Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return for the period. Their respectable success ratio suggests that the firm does well for investors and that this fund may benefit from that. Lastly, the process is limited by the number of months that the management team has been running this vehicle together.
This strategy tends to hold larger, more growth-oriented companies than its average peer in the Global Large-Stock Blend Morningstar Category. Looking at additional factor exposure, this strategy has consistently had exposure to high-momentum stocks compared with Morningstar Category peers over the past few years. Momentum strategies wager that market outperformers will continue to outperform, and laggards will continue to lag. Higher exposure to the former could mean the managers are overweighting stocks on winning streaks. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Momentum factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy also has had a defensive tilt, with exposure to higher-quality stocks compared with peers in recent years. This means that the fund holds companies that are profitable, growing, and have solid balance sheets. High exposure to the quality factor means holding companies that are consistently profitable, growing, and have solid balance sheets. Compared with category peers, the strategy also had more exposure to the Quality factor in the most recent month. In addition, the portfolio has tended to underweight yield, as shown in its lower exposure to companies that pay dividends or buy back shares than peers over these years. This is demonstrated by the portfolio's low exposure to dividends or buybacks. While companies with high yields provide consistent income payments, they may cut payouts if their earnings decline. In recent months, the strategy also had less Yield factor exposure than its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in technology and consumer cyclical relative to the category average by 6.9 and 4.3 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are industrials and communication services, underweight the average by 6.9 and 4.0 percentage points of assets, respectively. The strategy owns 80 securities and is relatively concentrated. Specifically, 38.8% of the strategy's assets are housed within the top 10 holdings, as opposed to the category’s 25.7% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, on a year-over-year basis, 28% of the fund's holdings have changed, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position.